Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

A comparive review of the differences between the BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB and ZTE Blade Force 16GB. We covered a wide range of variables

Created date: 2018-09-30 21:14:17, Updated date: 2020-04-16 15:34:35

ZTE Blade Force 16GBBenQ F5 (2014) 16GB
ZTE Blade Force 16GBBenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB".

ZTE Blade Force 16GBBenQ F5 (2014) 16GB
ZTE Blade Force 16GB

BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

General rating:

48.7/100

(The 1551th of all smartphones)

46.9/100

(The 659th of all smartphones)

Grip
51/100
64/100
Screen quality
61/100
56/100
Performance
48/100
47/100
Storage size
70/100
70/100
Battery
90/100
76/100
Rear-camera resolution
50/100
72/100
Front-camera resolution
65/100
50/100

What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"

The design of ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is 156.0mm long, 78.0mm wide, and 9.1mm thick. It weighs 170.1g.

The design of BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" is 143.0mm long, 72.8mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 135.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 13mm in length, 5.2mm in width, and 0.5mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" easier to use and carry around. "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" is bigger than "ZTE Blade Force 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" is more compact than "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 35g. The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand56/10068/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand39/10065/100
Ease of carrying around55/10062/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"

Display of the ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The display of "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" looks sleeker than that of "ZTE Blade Force 16GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" nor the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"

Camera performance of ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

The main camera of the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10050/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"

The processing capability of the ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8920 Snapdragon 427 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8926 Snapdragon 400 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" equally.

There is basically no difference between "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet71/10070/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games33/10031/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"

Battery performance of ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Battery performance of BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2520.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 480mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is a bit better. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" over the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB". Both the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet90/10076/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos79/10056/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"

The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" or "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 64GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is recommended over "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos. The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos76/10067/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" or "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" or "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is recommended as it has a 5.5inch screen. There isn't much difference between "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

Handling51/10064/100
Display61/10056/100
CPU specs48/10047/100
General rating60/10058/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade Force 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE Blade Force 16GBBenQ F5 (2014) 16GB
ZTE Blade Force 16GBBenQ F5 (2014) 16GB
ColorBlueBlack/White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)78.0mm x 156.0mm x 9.1mm72.8mm x 143.0mm x 8.5mm
Weight170.1g135.0g
Display size5.5inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density267ppi293ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh2520.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8920 Snapdragon 427Qualcomm MSM8926 Snapdragon 400
CPU specs1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles