Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB vs Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:15:36, Updated date: 2020-04-16 17:25:24

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GBLava Z50 (2018) 8GB
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GBLava Z50 (2018) 8GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB".

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GBLava Z50 (2018) 8GB
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

General rating:

36.8/100

(The 1817th of all smartphones)

39.2/100

(The 1759th of all smartphones)

Grip
78/100
68/100
Screen quality
46/100
41/100
Performance
27/100
26/100
Storage size
35/100
35/100
Battery
61/100
82/100
Rear-camera resolution
50/100
35/100
Front-camera resolution
50/100
65/100

What is the difference between the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"

The design of XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is 135.8mm long, 67.2mm wide, and 7.2mm thick. It weighs 100.0g.

The design of Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

The "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" is 135.0mm long, 66.6mm wide, and 9.7mm thick. It weighs 140.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 0.8mm in length, 0.6mm in width, and 2.4mm in thickness. Both the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB". Both the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 40g. The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

Ease of holding it in one hand76/10073/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand94/10061/100
Ease of carrying around68/10066/100

Compare the display of the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"

Display of the XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 540 x 960, and the pixel density is 234ppi. The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has a 4.7inch screen size.

Display of the Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

The "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" uses a TN TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 217ppi. The "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" has a 4.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" makes it more suited for playing games.

The display of "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" looks sleeker than that of "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" nor the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?63/10059/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?48/10041/100

Compare the camera performances of the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"

Camera performance of XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

The main camera of the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Camera performance of Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

The main camera of the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10035/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?50/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"

The processing capability of the XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

The processing capability of the Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" uses the Mediatek MT6737M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" equally.

There is basically no difference between "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Neither the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" nor the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet44/10041/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games11/10011/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"

Battery performance of XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 1800.0mAh.

Battery performance of Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

The "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" over the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB". The "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet61/10082/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos38/10066/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"

The storage capacity of the XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

The "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" or "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Neither the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" nor the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 32GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" is recommended over "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos.

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games35/10035/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos56/10066/100

Which to buy, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" or "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" or "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is a great choice. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB". There isn't much difference between "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

Handling78/10068/100
Display46/10041/100
CPU specs27/10026/100
General rating48/10048/100

Is it recommended to buy the XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GBLava Z50 (2018) 8GB
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GBLava Z50 (2018) 8GB
ColorBlack/WhiteGold/Black
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)67.2mm x 135.8mm x 7.2mm66.6mm x 135.0mm x 9.7mm
Weight100.0g140.0g
Display size4.7inch4.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDTN TFT
Screen resolution (width x height)540 x 960480 x 854
Pixel density234ppi217ppi
Battery capacity1800.0mAh2000.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200Mediatek MT6737M
CPU specs1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB1.0GB
Storage size8.0GB8.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP5.0MP
Front-camera resolution2.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles