Alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB vs AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:23:28, Updated date: 2020-04-16 19:33:54
How are the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" or "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"
- 2-1.At the end of the day which is better, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" or "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"?
- 2-2.Is it recommended to buy the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB, compared with other smartphones?
- 2-3.Is it recommended to buy the AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"
The design of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is 112.2mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 11.9mm thick. It weighs 98.0g.
The design of AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB
The "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" is 143.0mm long, 71.0mm wide, and 8.4mm thick. It weighs 137.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 30.7mm in length, 9mm in width, and 3.5mm in thickness. "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is bigger than "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is more compact than "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 39g. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 77/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 96/100 | 64/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 68/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"
Display of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has a 3.5inch screen size.
Display of the AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB
The "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" uses a IGZO liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" nor the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 25/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 15/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"
Camera performance of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
The main camera of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has 2.0MP.
Camera performance of AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB
The main camera of the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" has 13.1MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 11.1MP difference in comparison. The "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 20/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | - | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"
The processing capability of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" uses the Mediatek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.
The processing capability of the AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" uses the Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 254MB difference in memory capacity. The "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB". The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
The "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 24/100 | 74/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 4/100 | 37/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"
Battery performance of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1300.0mAh.
Battery performance of AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB
The "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2700.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1400mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". The "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 64/100 | 86/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 40/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"
The storage capacity of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB
The "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 496MB. The "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 240GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 2/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 54/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" or "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" or "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" is overall the clear winner.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 79/100 | 66/100 |
Display | 18/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 14/100 | 54/100 |
General rating | 35/100 | 64/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" and "AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | AQUOS U SHV37 au 16GB | |
Color | Black | × / × / × / × |
OS | Firefox | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 62.0mm x 112.2mm x 11.9mm | 71.0mm x 143.0mm x 8.4mm |
Weight | 98.0g | 137.0g |
Display size | 3.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | TFT | IGZO |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 320 x 480 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 164ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 1300.0mAh | 2700.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6572M | Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 |
CPU specs | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 256.0MB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 512.0MB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 2.0MP | 13.1MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |