Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the LG X Skin (2016) 16GB or alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-09-30 21:19:01, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:23:40

alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GBLG X Skin (2016) 16GB
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GBLG X Skin (2016) 16GB

How are the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GBLG X Skin (2016) 16GB
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB

LG X Skin (2016) 16GB

General rating:
Griprating-image3.9
62.0mm x 112.2mm x 11.9mm
rating-image3.5
71.4mm x 144.8mm x 6.9mm
Screen qualityrating-image1
TFT, 3.5inch, 320 x 480
rating-image2.8
IPS LCD, 5.0inch, 720 x 1280
Performancerating-image1
Mediatek MT6572M, 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores), 512.0MB
rating-image1.9
1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores), 1.5GB
Storage sizerating-image1
4.0GB
rating-image3.5
16.0GB
Batteryrating-image3.2
1300.0mAh
rating-image3.7
2100.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image1.0
2.0MP
rating-image2.5
8.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image
rating-image3.3
5.0MP

What is the difference between the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"

The design of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB

The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is 112.2mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 11.9mm thick. It weighs 100.0g.

The design of LG X Skin (2016) 16GB

The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is 144.8mm long, 71.4mm wide, and 6.9mm thick. It weighs 122.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 32.6mm in length, 9.4mm in width, and 5mm in thickness. "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is bigger than "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 22g. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB

LG X Skin (2016) 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand77/10071/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand94/10076/100
Ease of carrying around68/10064/100

Compare the display of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"

Display of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB

The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has a 3.5inch screen size.

Display of the LG X Skin (2016) 16GB

The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" nor the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB

LG X Skin (2016) 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?25/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?15/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"

Camera performance of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB

The main camera of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has 2.0MP.

Camera performance of LG X Skin (2016) 16GB

The main camera of the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 6MP difference in comparison. The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.

alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB

LG X Skin (2016) 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?20/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? - 65/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"

The processing capability of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" uses the Mediatek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.

The processing capability of the LG X Skin (2016) 16GB

The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.5GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB", the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 510.5MB difference in memory capacity. The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB". The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB". Neither the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" nor the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB

LG X Skin (2016) 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet24/10059/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games4/10021/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"

Battery performance of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB

The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1300.0mAh.

Battery performance of LG X Skin (2016) 16GB

The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2100.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 800mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB". The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.

alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB

LG X Skin (2016) 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet64/10074/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos40/10052/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"

The storage capacity of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB

The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the LG X Skin (2016) 16GB

The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 12GB. The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 12GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" or "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB".

alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB

LG X Skin (2016) 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games17/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos55/10059/100

Which to buy, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" or "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" or "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"?

"alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB", the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is overall the clear winner.

alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB

LG X Skin (2016) 16GB

Handling78/10070/100
Display18/10056/100
CPU specs15/10037/100
General rating37/10056/100

Is it recommended to buy the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the LG X Skin (2016) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GBLG X Skin (2016) 16GB
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GBLG X Skin (2016) 16GB
ColorBlack/WhiteGold/Titanium
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)62.0mm x 112.2mm x 11.9mm71.4mm x 144.8mm x 6.9mm
Weight100.0g122.0g
Display size3.5inch5.0inch
Display typeTFTIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)320 x 480720 x 1280
Pixel density164ppi293ppi
Battery capacity1300.0mAh2100.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6572M
CPU specs1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size512.0MB1.5GB
Storage size4.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution2.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles