Which one is better, the LG X Skin (2016) 16GB or alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:19:01, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:23:40
How are the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" or "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"
The design of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is 112.2mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 11.9mm thick. It weighs 100.0g.
The design of LG X Skin (2016) 16GB
The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is 144.8mm long, 71.4mm wide, and 6.9mm thick. It weighs 122.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 32.6mm in length, 9.4mm in width, and 5mm in thickness. "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is bigger than "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 22g. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | LG X Skin (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 77/100 | 71/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 94/100 | 76/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 68/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the display of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"
Display of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has a 3.5inch screen size.
Display of the LG X Skin (2016) 16GB
The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" nor the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | LG X Skin (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 25/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 15/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"
Camera performance of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
The main camera of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has 2.0MP.
Camera performance of LG X Skin (2016) 16GB
The main camera of the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 6MP difference in comparison. The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | LG X Skin (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 20/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | - | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"
The processing capability of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" uses the Mediatek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
The processing capability of the LG X Skin (2016) 16GB
The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.5GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB", the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 510.5MB difference in memory capacity. The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB". The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB". Neither the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" nor the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | LG X Skin (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 24/100 | 59/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 4/100 | 21/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"
Battery performance of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1300.0mAh.
Battery performance of LG X Skin (2016) 16GB
The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2100.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 800mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB". The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | LG X Skin (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 64/100 | 74/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 40/100 | 52/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the LG X Skin (2016) 16GB
The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 12GB. The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 12GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" or "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB".
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | LG X Skin (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 17/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 55/100 | 59/100 |
Which to buy, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" or "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" or "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB"?
"alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB", the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is overall the clear winner.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | LG X Skin (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 78/100 | 70/100 |
Display | 18/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 15/100 | 37/100 |
General rating | 37/100 | 56/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the LG X Skin (2016) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "LG X Skin (2016) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | LG X Skin (2016) 16GB | |
Color | Black/White | Gold/Titanium |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 62.0mm x 112.2mm x 11.9mm | 71.4mm x 144.8mm x 6.9mm |
Weight | 100.0g | 122.0g |
Display size | 3.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | TFT | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 320 x 480 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 164ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 1300.0mAh | 2100.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6572M | |
CPU specs | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 1.5GB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 2.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |