Alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB vs. Nokia XL (2014) 4GB Specs & Scores
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:39:27, Updated date: 2020-04-16 22:24:28
Which do we recommend after comparing the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB".
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | Nokia XL (2014) 4GB | |||
General rating: | 27.6/100 (The 1989th of all smartphones) | 31.2/100 (The 1958th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 78/100 | 46/100 | ||
Screen quality | 18/100 | 47/100 | ||
Performance | 15/100 | 17/100 | ||
Storage size | 17/100 | 17/100 | ||
Battery | 64/100 | 64/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 20/100 | 35/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | - /100 | 50/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and the "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" or "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" ?
What is the difference between the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and the "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"
The design of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is 112.2mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 11.9mm thick. It weighs 100.0g.
The design of Nokia XL (2014) 4GB
The "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" is 141.4mm long, 77.7mm wide, and 10.9mm thick. It weighs 190.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 29.2mm in length, 15.7mm in width, and 1mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" for portability.
The difference in weight is 90g. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | Nokia XL (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 77/100 | 53/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 94/100 | 26/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 68/100 | 54/100 |
Compare the display of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"
Display of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has a 3.5inch screen size.
Display of the Nokia XL (2014) 4GB
The "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 186ppi. The "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
The display of "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" looks sleeker than that of "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" nor the "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | Nokia XL (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 25/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 15/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"
Camera performance of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
The main camera of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has 2.0MP.
Camera performance of Nokia XL (2014) 4GB
The main camera of the "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. The "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | Nokia XL (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 20/100 | 35/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | - | 50/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"
The processing capability of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" uses the Mediatek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
The processing capability of the Nokia XL (2014) 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8225 Snapdragon S4 Play SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 768.0MB.
Which has the better processing capability?
The CPU specs are the same for both phones. This is a 256MB difference in memory capacity. The memory of "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" is slightly larger, so "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" is recommended over "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" for multitasking.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and the "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and the "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" equally. Neither the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" nor the "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
There is basically no difference between "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Neither the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" nor the "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | Nokia XL (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 24/100 | 24/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 4/100 | 5/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"
Battery performance of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1300.0mAh.
Battery performance of Nokia XL (2014) 4GB
The "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 700mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and the "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB".
If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | Nokia XL (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 64/100 | 64/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 40/100 | 40/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"
The storage capacity of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Nokia XL (2014) 4GB
The "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" or "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Neither the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" nor the "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" or "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB".
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | Nokia XL (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 17/100 | 17/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 55/100 | 55/100 |
Which to buy, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" or "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" or "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" a lot easier to use. There isn't much difference between "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | Nokia XL (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 78/100 | 46/100 |
Display | 18/100 | 47/100 |
CPU specs | 15/100 | 17/100 |
General rating | 37/100 | 39/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Nokia XL (2014) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" and "Nokia XL (2014) 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | Nokia XL (2014) 4GB | |
Color | Black/White | Bright green/orange/cyan/yellow/black/white |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 62.0mm x 112.2mm x 11.9mm | 77.7mm x 141.4mm x 10.9mm |
Weight | 100.0g | 190.0g |
Display size | 3.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | TFT | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 320 x 480 | 480 x 800 |
Pixel density | 164ppi | 186ppi |
Battery capacity | 1300.0mAh | 2000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6572M | Qualcomm MSM8225 Snapdragon S4 Play |
CPU specs | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 768.0MB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 2.0MP | 5.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 2.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |