A comparive review of the differences between the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB and alcatel Fire C 2G. We covered a wide range of variables
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:14:16, Updated date: 2020-04-16 16:45:42
Which do we recommend after comparing the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB".
alcatel Fire C 2G | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB | |||
General rating: | 28.6/100 (The 1985th of all smartphones) | 39.6/100 (The 1747th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 80/100 | 61/100 | ||
Screen quality | 18/100 | 56/100 | ||
Performance | 11/100 | 28/100 | ||
Storage size | 1/100 | 35/100 | ||
Battery | 45/100 | 64/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 25/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | - /100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "alcatel Fire C 2G" or "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" ?
What is the difference between the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"
The design of alcatel Fire C 2G
The "alcatel Fire C 2G" is 112.2mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 12.0mm thick. It weighs 93.0g.
The design of Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB
The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" is 145.0mm long, 72.8mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 150.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 32.8mm in length, 10.7mm in width, and 3.5mm in thickness. "alcatel Fire C 2G" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. Flick typing is easier on the "alcatel Fire C 2G", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "alcatel Fire C 2G" is more compact than "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 57g. The "alcatel Fire C 2G" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
alcatel Fire C 2G | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 77/100 | 68/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 100/100 | 53/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 68/100 | 62/100 |
Compare the display of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"
Display of the alcatel Fire C 2G
The "alcatel Fire C 2G" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "alcatel Fire C 2G" has a 3.5inch screen size.
Display of the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB
The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "alcatel Fire C 2G" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "alcatel Fire C 2G" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "alcatel Fire C 2G" nor the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
alcatel Fire C 2G | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 25/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 15/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"
Camera performance of alcatel Fire C 2G
The main camera of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" has 3.0MP.
Camera performance of Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB
The main camera of the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 10MP difference in comparison. The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
alcatel Fire C 2G | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 25/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | - | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"
The processing capability of the alcatel Fire C 2G
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "alcatel Fire C 2G" uses the Spreadtrum 6821 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores). The memory capacity is 128.0MB.
The processing capability of the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" uses the Mediatek MT6582 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "alcatel Fire C 2G", the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 127MB difference in memory capacity. The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" has more memory storage, making the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" is the better choice to buy over the "alcatel Fire C 2G". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB". The "alcatel Fire C 2G" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" as it has better performance. Neither the "alcatel Fire C 2G" nor the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
alcatel Fire C 2G | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 17/100 | 47/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 3/100 | 12/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"
Battery performance of alcatel Fire C 2G
The "alcatel Fire C 2G" has a battery capacity of 1000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB
The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" over the "alcatel Fire C 2G".
The battery life of the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "alcatel Fire C 2G" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
alcatel Fire C 2G | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 45/100 | 64/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 23/100 | 40/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"
The storage capacity of the alcatel Fire C 2G
The "alcatel Fire C 2G" has 256.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB
The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 248MB. The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "alcatel Fire C 2G" unfortunately falls behind here. Neither the "alcatel Fire C 2G" nor the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 8GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "alcatel Fire C 2G" or "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB".
alcatel Fire C 2G | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 1/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 54/100 | 56/100 |
Which to buy, the "alcatel Fire C 2G" or "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "alcatel Fire C 2G" or "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "alcatel Fire C 2G" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" a lot easier to use. The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" and the "alcatel Fire C 2G", the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" is overall the clear winner.
alcatel Fire C 2G | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 80/100 | 61/100 |
Display | 18/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 11/100 | 28/100 |
General rating | 31/100 | 50/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the alcatel Fire C 2G, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "alcatel Fire C 2G" looks compact, and is quite excellent in its ease of being held. It is recommended if you are looking for a device that can be easily operated and held with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "alcatel Fire C 2G" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
alcatel Fire C 2G | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 8GB | |
Color | Bluish Black/Dark Chocolate | Black |
OS | Firefox | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 62.0mm x 112.2mm x 12.0mm | 72.8mm x 145.0mm x 8.5mm |
Weight | 93.0g | 150.0g |
Display size | 3.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | TFT | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 320 x 480 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 164ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 1000.0mAh | 2000.0mAh |
Chipset | Spreadtrum 6821 | Mediatek MT6582 |
CPU specs | 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 128.0MB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0MB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 3.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |