A comparive review of the differences between the verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro and alcatel Fire C 2G. We covered a wide range of variables
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:24:31, Updated date: 2020-04-16 16:55:57
How are the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
alcatel Fire C 2G | verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro | |||
General rating: | 28.6/100 (The 1985th of all smartphones) | 53.3/100 (The 1438th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 80/100 | 48/100 | ||
Screen quality | 18/100 | 61/100 | ||
Performance | 11/100 | 28/100 | ||
Storage size | 1/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 45/100 | 90/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 25/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | - /100 | 80/100 |
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"
- 2.Which to buy, the "alcatel Fire C 2G" or "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" ?
What is the difference between the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"
The design of alcatel Fire C 2G
The "alcatel Fire C 2G" is 112.2mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 12.0mm thick. It weighs 93.0g.
The design of verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro
The "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" is 153.5mm long, 78.0mm wide, and 10.0mm thick. It weighs 179.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 41.3mm in length, 16mm in width, and 2mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "alcatel Fire C 2G" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "alcatel Fire C 2G", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "alcatel Fire C 2G" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" for portability.
The difference in weight is 86g. The "alcatel Fire C 2G" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
alcatel Fire C 2G | verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 77/100 | 54/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 100/100 | 33/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 68/100 | 54/100 |
Compare the display of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"
Display of the alcatel Fire C 2G
The "alcatel Fire C 2G" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "alcatel Fire C 2G" has a 3.5inch screen size.
Display of the verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro
The "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Fire C 2G" shows only an unsatisfactory performance. In the gaming end, the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" offers a more suitable screen size. The "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Fire C 2G" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
In terms of display, the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "alcatel Fire C 2G" nor the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
alcatel Fire C 2G | verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 25/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 15/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"
Camera performance of alcatel Fire C 2G
The main camera of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" has 3.0MP.
Camera performance of verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro
The main camera of the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 10MP difference in comparison. The "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
alcatel Fire C 2G | verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 25/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | - | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"
The processing capability of the alcatel Fire C 2G
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "alcatel Fire C 2G" uses the Spreadtrum 6821 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores). The memory capacity is 128.0MB.
The processing capability of the verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" uses the Mediatek MT6737 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "alcatel Fire C 2G", the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 127MB difference in memory capacity. The "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" has more memory storage, making the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" is the better choice to buy over the "alcatel Fire C 2G". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro". The "alcatel Fire C 2G" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" as it has better performance. Neither the "alcatel Fire C 2G" nor the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
alcatel Fire C 2G | verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 17/100 | 47/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 3/100 | 12/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"
Battery performance of alcatel Fire C 2G
The "alcatel Fire C 2G" has a battery capacity of 1000.0mAh.
Battery performance of verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro
The "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" over the "alcatel Fire C 2G". The "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Fire C 2G" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
alcatel Fire C 2G | verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 45/100 | 90/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 23/100 | 79/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"
The storage capacity of the alcatel Fire C 2G
The "alcatel Fire C 2G" has 256.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro
The "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 240MB. The "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "alcatel Fire C 2G" unfortunately falls behind here. The "alcatel Fire C 2G" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 48GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content.
alcatel Fire C 2G | verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 1/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 54/100 | 67/100 |
Which to buy, the "alcatel Fire C 2G" or "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"
At the end of the day which is better, the "alcatel Fire C 2G" or "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "alcatel Fire C 2G" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" a lot easier to use. The "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" and the "alcatel Fire C 2G", the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" is overall the clear winner.
alcatel Fire C 2G | verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 80/100 | 48/100 |
Display | 18/100 | 61/100 |
CPU specs | 11/100 | 28/100 |
General rating | 31/100 | 58/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the alcatel Fire C 2G, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "alcatel Fire C 2G" looks compact, and is quite excellent in its ease of being held. It is recommended if you are looking for a device that can be easily operated and held with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "alcatel Fire C 2G" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" and "verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
alcatel Fire C 2G | verykool SL5560 Maverick Pro | |
Color | Bluish Black/Dark Chocolate | blue,gray |
OS | Firefox | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 62.0mm x 112.2mm x 12.0mm | 78.0mm x 153.5mm x 10.0mm |
Weight | 93.0g | 179.0g |
Display size | 3.5inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | TFT | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 320 x 480 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 164ppi | 267ppi |
Battery capacity | 1000.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Spreadtrum 6821 | Mediatek MT6737 |
CPU specs | 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 128.0MB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0MB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 3.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP |