Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Allview P5 Energy 16GB vs ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB: Which is the best?

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:42:05, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:12:31

Allview P5 Energy 16GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
Allview P5 Energy 16GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

Allview P5 Energy 16GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
Allview P5 Energy 16GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

General rating:

38.3/100

(The 1780th of all smartphones)

50.3/100

(The 1506th of all smartphones)

Grip
64/100
54/100
Screen quality
41/100
61/100
Performance
25/100
48/100
Storage size
70/100
70/100
Battery
100/100
90/100
Rear-camera resolution
35/100
72/100
Front-camera resolution
50/100
65/100

What is the difference between the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

The design of Allview P5 Energy 16GB

The "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" is 134.2mm long, 66.2mm wide, and 11.2mm thick. It weighs 156.5g.

The design of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 156.0mm long, 77.5mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 156.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 21.8mm in length, 11.2mm in width, and 2.2mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" is more compact than "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 0.5g. There is very little difference in weight between the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.

Allview P5 Energy 16GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand72/10057/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand48/10048/100
Ease of carrying around65/10056/100

Compare the display of the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

Display of the Allview P5 Energy 16GB

The "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 217ppi. The "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" has a 4.5inch screen size.

Display of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" nor the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Allview P5 Energy 16GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?59/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?41/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

Camera performance of Allview P5 Energy 16GB

The main camera of the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Camera performance of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Allview P5 Energy 16GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?35/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?50/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

The processing capability of the Allview P5 Energy 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6735M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

The processing capability of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB", the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". The "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" than the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB". The "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Allview P5 Energy 16GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet38/10071/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games11/10033/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

Battery performance of Allview P5 Energy 16GB

The "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.

Battery performance of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". Both the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Allview P5 Energy 16GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10090/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10079/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

The storage capacity of the Allview P5 Energy 16GB

The "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" or "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 224GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Allview P5 Energy 16GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos59/10090/100

Which to buy, the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" or "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" or "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"?

"Allview P5 Energy 16GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" overall, "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

Allview P5 Energy 16GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Handling64/10054/100
Display41/10061/100
CPU specs25/10048/100
General rating54/10063/100

Is it recommended to buy the Allview P5 Energy 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Allview P5 Energy 16GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
Allview P5 Energy 16GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
ColorBlack/WhiteBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)66.2mm x 134.2mm x 11.2mm77.5mm x 156.0mm x 8.9mm
Weight156.5g156.0g
Display size4.5inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 854720 x 1280
Pixel density217ppi267ppi
Battery capacity4000.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6735MQualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425
CPU specs1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution5.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution2.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles