Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Compare Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB vs Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:06:55, Updated date: 2021-10-20 19:47:12

Pegasus 2 Plus 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
Pegasus 2 Plus 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB".

Pegasus 2 Plus 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.9
75.5mm x 151.8mm x 8.1mm
rating-image3.2
71.8mm x 145.6mm x 8.0mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.7
IPS LCD, 5.5inch, 1080 x 1920
rating-image2.8
IPS LCD, 5.0inch, 720 x 1280
Performancerating-image3.5
Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615, 1.7GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores), 3.0GB
rating-image2.4
Broadcom BCM23550, 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores), 2.0GB
Storage sizerating-image3.9
32.0GB
rating-image3.5
16.0GB
Batteryrating-image4.2
3030.0mAh
rating-image3.8
2500.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
13.0MP
rating-image2.5
8.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
8.0MP
rating-image2.5
2.0MP

What is the difference between the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The design of Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB

The "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" is 151.8mm long, 75.5mm wide, and 8.1mm thick. It weighs 156.0g.

The design of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is 145.6mm long, 71.8mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 149.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

"Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is bigger than "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 7g. "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" weighs less than "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" and is easier to handle.

Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand63/10070/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand48/10054/100
Ease of carrying around59/10063/100

Compare the display of the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Display of the Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB

The "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Camera performance of Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB

The main camera of the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The main camera of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 6MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10050/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The processing capability of the Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.7GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" uses the Broadcom BCM23550 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB", the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB". The "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" than the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB".

Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet80/10070/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games57/10031/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Battery performance of Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB

The "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3030.0mAh.

Battery performance of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 530mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" is a bit better. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" over the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Both the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.

Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet84/10076/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos69/10055/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The storage capacity of the Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB

The "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" is recommended over "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos.

Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos65/10059/100

Which to buy, the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" or "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" or "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"?

"Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB", the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" is overall the clear winner.

Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Handling57/10063/100
Display74/10056/100
CPU specs69/10047/100
General rating70/10056/100

Is it recommended to buy the Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Pegasus 2 Plus 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Pegasus 2 Plus 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
Pegasus 2 Plus 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
ColorRose Gold/WhiteWhite
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)75.5mm x 151.8mm x 8.1mm71.8mm x 145.6mm x 8.0mm
Weight156.0g149.0g
Display size5.5inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 1920720 x 1280
Pixel density400ppi293ppi
Battery capacity3030.0mAh2500.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615Broadcom BCM23550
CPU specs1.7GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB2.0GB
Storage size32.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles