Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB vs Blade V7Max 32GB

Created date: 2018-09-30 21:24:08, Updated date: 2021-10-20 16:37:54

BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GBBlade V7Max 32GB
BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GBBlade V7Max 32GB

How are the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and "Blade V7Max 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GBBlade V7Max 32GB
BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB

Blade V7Max 32GB

General rating:
Griprating-image3.2
74.6mm x 151.9mm x 6.9mm
rating-image2.8
77.0mm x 154.0mm x 7.2mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.1
AMOLED, 5.5inch, 720 x 1280
rating-image3.7
IPS, 5.5inch, 1080 x 1920
Performancerating-image3.7
Mediatek MT6753, 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores), 3.0GB
rating-image4.1
MTK6755M, 1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores), 3.0GB
Storage sizerating-image3.9
32.0GB
rating-image3.9
32.0GB
Batteryrating-image4.5
3150.0mAh
rating-image4.4
3000.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
13.0MP
rating-image4.0
16.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
5.0MP
rating-image4.0
8.0MP

What is the difference between the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and the "Blade V7Max 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and "Blade V7Max 32GB"

The design of BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB

The "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" is 151.9mm long, 74.6mm wide, and 6.9mm thick. It weighs 142.6g.

The design of Blade V7Max 32GB

The "Blade V7Max 32GB" is 154.0mm long, 77.0mm wide, and 7.2mm thick. It weighs 167.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 2mm in length, 2.4mm in width, and 0.2mm in thickness. "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and "Blade V7Max 32GB". Both the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and "Blade V7Max 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 24.4g. The "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB

Blade V7Max 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand67/10062/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand59/10041/100
Ease of carrying around61/10058/100

Compare the display of the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and "Blade V7Max 32GB"

Display of the BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB

The "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the Blade V7Max 32GB

The "Blade V7Max 32GB" uses a IPS liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "Blade V7Max 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and the "Blade V7Max 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and the "Blade V7Max 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Blade V7Max 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Blade V7Max 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB". The "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB

Blade V7Max 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and "Blade V7Max 32GB"

Camera performance of BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB

The main camera of the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of Blade V7Max 32GB

The main camera of the "Blade V7Max 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "Blade V7Max 32GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "Blade V7Max 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and the "Blade V7Max 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Blade V7Max 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Blade V7Max 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB

Blade V7Max 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10080/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and "Blade V7Max 32GB"

The processing capability of the BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6753 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the Blade V7Max 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Blade V7Max 32GB" uses the MTK6755M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB", the "Blade V7Max 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "Blade V7Max 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Blade V7Max 32GB". Both the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and the "Blade V7Max 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The "Blade V7Max 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Blade V7Max 32GB" as it has better performance. The "Blade V7Max 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB

Blade V7Max 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet82/10089/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games66/10073/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and "Blade V7Max 32GB"

Battery performance of BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB

The "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3150.0mAh.

Battery performance of Blade V7Max 32GB

The "Blade V7Max 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 150mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and the "Blade V7Max 32GB". Both the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and the "Blade V7Max 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices. Both the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and the "Blade V7Max 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB

Blade V7Max 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet90/10087/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos78/10074/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and "Blade V7Max 32GB"

The storage capacity of the BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB

The "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Blade V7Max 32GB

The "Blade V7Max 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" or "Blade V7Max 32GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 64GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "Blade V7Max 32GB" is recommended over "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos. Both the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and the "Blade V7Max 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB

Blade V7Max 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos70/10078/100

Which to buy, the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" or "Blade V7Max 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" or "Blade V7Max 32GB"?

"BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Blade V7Max 32GB" a lot easier to use. "Blade V7Max 32GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB

Blade V7Max 32GB

Handling63/10055/100
Display61/10074/100
CPU specs73/10082/100
General rating69/10073/100

Is it recommended to buy the BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Blade V7Max 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Blade V7Max 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Blade V7Max 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and "Blade V7Max 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" and "Blade V7Max 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GBBlade V7Max 32GB
BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GBBlade V7Max 32GB
ColorSilver/Gold/
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)74.6mm x 151.9mm x 6.9mm77.0mm x 154.0mm x 7.2mm
Weight142.6g167.0g
Display size5.5inch5.5inch
Display typeAMOLEDIPS
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 12801080 x 1920
Pixel density267ppi400ppi
Battery capacity3150.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6753MTK6755M
CPU specs1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB3.0GB
Storage size32.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP16.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles