Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

BLU Life Max 16GB vs Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2018-09-30 21:41:13, Updated date: 2020-04-16 15:33:04

BLU Life Max 16GBSharp Z2 (2016) 32GB
BLU Life Max 16GBSharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

How are the "BLU Life Max 16GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

BLU Life Max 16GBSharp Z2 (2016) 32GB
BLU Life Max 16GB

Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.8
55/100
rating-image2.8
56/100
Screen qualityrating-image3.1
61/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Performancerating-image2.4
48/100
rating-image4.7
94/100
Storage sizerating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image4.4
87/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image4.0
80/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
65/100
rating-image4.0
80/100

What is the difference between the "BLU Life Max 16GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "BLU Life Max 16GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"

The design of BLU Life Max 16GB

The "BLU Life Max 16GB" is 154.5mm long, 77.1mm wide, and 8.7mm thick. It weighs 153.0g.

The design of Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is 153.0mm long, 76.0mm wide, and 8.4mm thick. It weighs 160.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 1.5mm in length, 1mm in width, and 0.2mm in thickness. Both the "BLU Life Max 16GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "BLU Life Max 16GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". Both the "BLU Life Max 16GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 7g. There is very little difference in weight between the "BLU Life Max 16GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.

BLU Life Max 16GB

Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand59/10061/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand50/10046/100
Ease of carrying around57/10058/100

Compare the display of the "BLU Life Max 16GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"

Display of the BLU Life Max 16GB

The "BLU Life Max 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "BLU Life Max 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" uses a LTPS IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "BLU Life Max 16GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "BLU Life Max 16GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "BLU Life Max 16GB". The "BLU Life Max 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

BLU Life Max 16GB

Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "BLU Life Max 16GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"

Camera performance of BLU Life Max 16GB

The main camera of the "BLU Life Max 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

The main camera of the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

BLU Life Max 16GB

Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10080/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "BLU Life Max 16GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"

The processing capability of the BLU Life Max 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU Life Max 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6737 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6797 Helio X20 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.3GHz+2.0GHz+1.4GHz×10(10.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "BLU Life Max 16GB", the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "BLU Life Max 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" than the "BLU Life Max 16GB". The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

BLU Life Max 16GB

Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet71/10099/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games32/10090/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "BLU Life Max 16GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"

Battery performance of BLU Life Max 16GB

The "BLU Life Max 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3700.0mAh.

Battery performance of Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 700mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "BLU Life Max 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "BLU Life Max 16GB" over the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". Both the "BLU Life Max 16GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "BLU Life Max 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "BLU Life Max 16GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

BLU Life Max 16GB

Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10087/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos95/10074/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "BLU Life Max 16GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"

The storage capacity of the BLU Life Max 16GB

The "BLU Life Max 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "BLU Life Max 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 208GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

BLU Life Max 16GB

Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos67/10090/100

Which to buy, the "BLU Life Max 16GB" or "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "BLU Life Max 16GB" or "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "BLU Life Max 16GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" and the "BLU Life Max 16GB", the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is overall the clear winner.

BLU Life Max 16GB

Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

Handling55/10056/100
Display61/10074/100
CPU specs48/10094/100
General rating61/10076/100

Is it recommended to buy the BLU Life Max 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "BLU Life Max 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "BLU Life Max 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "BLU Life Max 16GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "BLU Life Max 16GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

BLU Life Max 16GBSharp Z2 (2016) 32GB
BLU Life Max 16GBSharp Z2 (2016) 32GB
ColorDark BlueSilver/Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)77.1mm x 154.5mm x 8.7mm76.0mm x 153.0mm x 8.4mm
Weight153.0g160.0g
Display size5.5inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDLTPS IPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 12801080 x 1920
Pixel density267ppi400ppi
Battery capacity3700.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6737Mediatek MT6797 Helio X20
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)2.3GHz+2.0GHz+1.4GHz×10(10.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB4.0GB
Storage size16.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP16.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles