Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB and verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB review

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:39:39, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:59:22

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GBverykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GBverykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB

How are the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GBverykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB

General rating:

34.4/100

(The 2877th of all smartphones)

41/100

(The 1710th of all smartphones)

Grip
58/100
51/100
Screen quality
48/100
61/100
Performance
24/100
28/100
Storage size
17/100
70/100
Battery
72/100
90/100
Rear-camera resolution
35/100
50/100
Front-camera resolution
- /100
65/100

What is the difference between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB"

The design of BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is 143.0mm long, 73.8mm wide, and 9.8mm thick. It weighs 151.0g.

The design of verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB

The "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" is 154.8mm long, 78.2mm wide, and 8.8mm thick. It weighs 169.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 11.8mm in length, 4.4mm in width, and 1mm in thickness. "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is bigger than "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 18g. The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand63/10056/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand52/10040/100
Ease of carrying around59/10056/100

Compare the display of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB"

Display of the BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" uses a LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Display of the verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB

The "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" nor the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?68/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?60/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB"

Camera performance of BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

The main camera of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB

The main camera of the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. The "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?35/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? - 65/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB"

The processing capability of the BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" uses the Mediatek MT6580 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.

The processing capability of the verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6580 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

The CPU specs are the same for both phones. This is a 511MB difference in memory capacity. The "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" equally.

There is basically no difference between "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Neither the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" nor the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet47/10047/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games7/10012/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB"

Battery performance of BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.

Battery performance of verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB

The "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". Both the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet72/10090/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos49/10079/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB"

The storage capacity of the BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB

The "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 12GB. The "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 12GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" or "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB".

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games17/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos65/10067/100

Which to buy, the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" or "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" or "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB"?

"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" a lot easier to use. There isn't much difference between "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Between the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" and the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" is overall the clear winner.

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB

Handling58/10051/100
Display48/10061/100
CPU specs24/10028/100
General rating43/10056/100

Is it recommended to buy the BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "verykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GBverykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GBverykool s5528 Cosmo 16GB
ColorBlack/White/GoldBlack/Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)73.8mm x 143.0mm x 9.8mm78.2mm x 154.8mm x 8.8mm
Weight151.0g169.0g
Display size5.0inch5.5inch
Display typeLCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 854720 x 1280
Pixel density195ppi267ppi
Battery capacity2000.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6580Mediatek MT6580
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size512.0MB1.0GB
Storage size4.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution5.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles