BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB vs Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:58:27, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:18:10
Which do we recommend after comparing the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" or "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"
The design of BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB
The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is 143.0mm long, 73.8mm wide, and 9.8mm thick. It weighs 151.0g.
The design of Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB
The "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" is 143.5mm long, 71.5mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 147.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 0.5mm in length, 2.2mm in width, and 1.3mm in thickness. "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" is bigger than "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 4g. There is very little difference in weight between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 63/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 52/100 | 55/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 59/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"
Display of the BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB
The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" uses a LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB
The "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size.
In terms of display, the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" nor the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"
Camera performance of BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB
The main camera of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB
The main camera of the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. The "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 35/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | - | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"
The processing capability of the BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" uses the Mediatek MT6580 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
The processing capability of the Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6735 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 510MB difference in memory capacity. The "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB".
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 47/100 | 71/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 7/100 | 32/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"
Battery performance of BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB
The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB
The "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" is a bit better. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". Both the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 72/100 | 82/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 49/100 | 66/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"
The storage capacity of the BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB
The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB
The "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 12GB. The "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 12GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" or "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB".
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 17/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 65/100 | 67/100 |
Which to buy, the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" or "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" or "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB". If you want a larger screen, "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" is recommended as it has a 5.0inch screen. The "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" and the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" is overall the clear winner.
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 58/100 | 63/100 |
Display | 48/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 24/100 | 48/100 |
General rating | 43/100 | 59/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | Wiko U Feel Lite 16GB | |
Color | Black/White/Gold | Lime/Slate/Chocolate/Rose Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.8mm x 143.0mm x 9.8mm | 71.5mm x 143.5mm x 8.5mm |
Weight | 151.0g | 147.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 854 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 195ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 2000.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6580 | Mediatek MT6735 |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |