Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

BLU Neo X Plus 8GB vs BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB: Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:18:26, Updated date: 2020-04-16 19:45:30

BLU Neo X Plus 8GBBenQ F52 (2015) 16GB
BLU Neo X Plus 8GBBenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

How are the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

BLU Neo X Plus 8GBBenQ F52 (2015) 16GB
BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.7
77.9mm x 152.6mm x 8.3mm
rating-image3.0
74.5mm x 147.0mm x 9.3mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.1
IPS LCD, 5.5inch, 720 x 1280
rating-image3.7
IPS LCD, 5.2inch, 1080 x 1920
Performancerating-image1.4
Cortex-A7, 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores), 1.0GB
rating-image2.7
Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615, 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores), 2.0GB
Storage sizerating-image1.8
8.0GB
rating-image3.5
16.0GB
Batteryrating-image3.9
2500.0mAh
rating-image3.9
2500.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image2.5
8.0MP
rating-image3.6
13.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
5.0MP
rating-image4.0
8.0MP

What is the difference between the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"

The design of BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

The "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" is 152.6mm long, 77.9mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 162.0g.

The design of BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is 147.0mm long, 74.5mm wide, and 9.3mm thick. It weighs 142.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 5.5mm in length, 3.4mm in width, and 1mm in thickness. Both the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". Both the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 20g. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand58/10063/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand44/10060/100
Ease of carrying around56/10059/100

Compare the display of the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"

Display of the BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

The "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB". The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10070/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10070/100

Compare the camera performances of the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"

Camera performance of BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

The main camera of the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

The main camera of the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"

The processing capability of the BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" uses the Cortex-A7 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

The processing capability of the BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB", the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB".

The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" than the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB". The "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet47/10074/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games12/10037/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"

Battery performance of BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

The "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Battery performance of BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". Both the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices.

BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet78/10077/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos58/10057/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"

The storage capacity of the BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

The "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 8GB. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 8GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" or "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB".

BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games35/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos66/10067/100

Which to buy, the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" or "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" or "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"?

"BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.2inch makes the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" and the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB", the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is overall the clear winner.

BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

Handling53/10060/100
Display61/10074/100
CPU specs28/10054/100
General rating50/10064/100

Is it recommended to buy the BLU Neo X Plus 8GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

BLU Neo X Plus 8GBBenQ F52 (2015) 16GB
BLU Neo X Plus 8GBBenQ F52 (2015) 16GB
ColorBlack/WhiteGlam Pink/Chic Gray
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)77.9mm x 152.6mm x 8.3mm74.5mm x 147.0mm x 9.3mm
Weight162.0g142.0g
Display size5.5inch5.2inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 12801080 x 1920
Pixel density267ppi423ppi
Battery capacity2500.0mAh2500.0mAh
ChipsetCortex-A7Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB2.0GB
Storage size8.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles