Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB or BLU Neo X Plus 8GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:21:16, Updated date: 2020-04-16 19:48:20

BLU Neo X Plus 8GBGalaxy A9 (2016) 32GB
BLU Neo X Plus 8GBGalaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB".

BLU Neo X Plus 8GBGalaxy A9 (2016) 32GB
BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.7
53/100
rating-image2.3
45/100
Screen qualityrating-image3.1
61/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Performancerating-image1.4
28/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Storage sizerating-image1.8
35/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Batteryrating-image3.9
78/100
rating-image5.0
99/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
65/100
rating-image4.0
80/100

What is the difference between the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"

The design of BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

The "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" is 152.6mm long, 77.9mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 162.0g.

The design of Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is 161.7mm long, 80.9mm wide, and 7.4mm thick. It weighs 200.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 9mm in length, 3mm in width, and 0.9mm in thickness. Both the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". Both the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 38g. The "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand58/10053/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand44/10019/100
Ease of carrying around56/10054/100

Compare the display of the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"

Display of the BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

The "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 367ppi. The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB". The "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10076/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10078/100

Compare the camera performances of the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"

Camera performance of BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

The main camera of the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"

The processing capability of the BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" uses the Cortex-A7 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

The processing capability of the Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB", the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" than the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB". The "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet47/10082/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games12/10066/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"

Battery performance of BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

The "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Battery performance of Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" over the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB". Both the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet78/10099/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos58/10094/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"

The storage capacity of the BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

The "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 24GB. The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 216GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games35/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos66/10090/100

Which to buy, the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" or "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" or "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"?

"BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 6.0inch makes the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" and the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB", the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is overall the clear winner.

BLU Neo X Plus 8GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Handling53/10045/100
Display61/10074/100
CPU specs28/10074/100
General rating50/10073/100

Is it recommended to buy the BLU Neo X Plus 8GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "BLU Neo X Plus 8GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

BLU Neo X Plus 8GBGalaxy A9 (2016) 32GB
BLU Neo X Plus 8GBGalaxy A9 (2016) 32GB
ColorBlack/WhitePearl White/Midnight Black/Champagne Gold/Pink
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)77.9mm x 152.6mm x 8.3mm80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.4mm
Weight162.0g200.0g
Display size5.5inch6.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 12801080 x 1920
Pixel density267ppi367ppi
Battery capacity2500.0mAh4000.0mAh
ChipsetCortex-A7Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB3.0GB
Storage size8.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles