Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB vs LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:46:27, Updated date: 2021-10-20 16:06:47
How are the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB | |||
General rating: | 42.6/100 (The 2605th of all smartphones) | 50.1/100 (The 1512th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 76/100 | 56/100 | ||
Screen quality | 47/100 | 61/100 | ||
Performance | 17/100 | 47/100 | ||
Storage size | 17/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 71/100 | 85/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 35/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 55/100 | 80/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" or "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"
The design of Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB
The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is 138.0mm long, 68.5mm wide, and 10.0mm thick. It weighs 78.2g.
The design of LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB
The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" is 155.0mm long, 79.6mm wide, and 7.4mm thick. It weighs 145.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 17mm in length, 11mm in width, and 2.5mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is more compact than "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 66.8g. The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 71/100 | 56/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 100/100 | 57/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 64/100 | 56/100 |
Compare the display of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"
Display of the Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB
The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 854 x 960, and the pixel density is 285ppi. The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has a 4.5inch screen size.
Display of the LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB
The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 257ppi. The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The display of "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" looks sleeker than that of "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" nor the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 59/100 | 73/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 41/100 | 75/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"
Camera performance of Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB
The main camera of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 3.0MP.
Camera performance of LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB
The main camera of the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 5MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 35/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 55/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"
The processing capability of the Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB
The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
The processing capability of the LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 510MB difference in memory capacity. The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB". The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB". The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 28/100 | 70/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 4/100 | 31/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"
Battery performance of Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB
The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.
Battery performance of LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB
The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" over the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB". Both the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 71/100 | 85/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 47/100 | 70/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB
The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB
The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 12GB. The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 236GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 17/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 55/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" or "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" or "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.7inch makes the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" and the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" is overall the clear winner.
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 76/100 | 56/100 |
Display | 47/100 | 61/100 |
CPU specs | 17/100 | 47/100 |
General rating | 45/100 | 63/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. Judging from the overall specs, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Is it recommended to buy the LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | LG Stylus 2 (2016) 16GB | |
Color | White/Black | Titan/White/Brown |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 68.5mm x 138.0mm x 10.0mm | 79.6mm x 155.0mm x 7.4mm |
Weight | 78.2g | 145.0g |
Display size | 4.5inch | 5.7inch |
Display type | TFT | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 854 x 960 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 285ppi | 257ppi |
Battery capacity | 2000.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 | |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 3.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |