Which one is better, the Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB or Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:01:25, Updated date: 2021-10-20 16:21:45
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" or "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"
The design of Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB
The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is 138.0mm long, 68.5mm wide, and 10.0mm thick. It weighs 78.2g.
The design of Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB
The "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" is 146.0mm long, 71.5mm wide, and 8.8mm thick. It weighs 165.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 8mm in length, 3mm in width, and 1.1mm in thickness. Both the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB". Both the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 86.8g. The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 71/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 100/100 | 42/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 64/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"
Display of the Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB
The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 854 x 960, and the pixel density is 285ppi. The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has a 4.5inch screen size.
Display of the Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB
The "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. In the gaming end, the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" offers a more suitable screen size.
There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" nor the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 59/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 41/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"
Camera performance of Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB
The main camera of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 3.0MP.
Camera performance of Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB
The main camera of the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. The "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.
There is a 2MP difference in front camera pixel number. When taking photos of distant objects, including photos taken using a selfie stick or photos that require clear backgrounds, the camera of "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" has better performance. The "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 35/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 55/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"
The processing capability of the Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB
The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
The processing capability of the Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8909v2 Snapdragon 212 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 511MB difference in memory capacity. The "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" has more memory storage, making the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB". The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
There is basically no difference between "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" as it has better performance. Neither the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" nor the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 28/100 | 47/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 4/100 | 12/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"
Battery performance of Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB
The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB
The "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" is a bit better. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" over the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB". Both the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 71/100 | 82/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 47/100 | 66/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"
The storage capacity of the Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB
The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB
The "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 4GB. The "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. Neither the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" nor the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 36GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content.
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 17/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 55/100 | 66/100 |
Which to buy, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" or "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" or "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" is recommended as it has a 5.0inch screen. The "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" overall, "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 76/100 | 60/100 |
Display | 47/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 17/100 | 28/100 |
General rating | 45/100 | 51/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. Judging from the overall specs, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | |
Color | White/Black | True Black/Flashy Red/Cool Grey/Bleen/Sun Yellow/Hot Pink |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 68.5mm x 138.0mm x 10.0mm | 71.5mm x 146.0mm x 8.8mm |
Weight | 78.2g | 165.0g |
Display size | 4.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | TFT | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 854 x 960 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 285ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 2000.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8909v2 Snapdragon 212 | |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 3.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |