A comparive review of the differences between the HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB and Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB. We covered a wide range of variables
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:03:07, Updated date: 2020-04-16 22:16:20
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB".
Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB | HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB | |||
General rating: | 37.5/100 (The 2766th of all smartphones) | 51.7/100 (The 556th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 75/100 | 63/100 | ||
Screen quality | 41/100 | 56/100 | ||
Performance | 16/100 | 71/100 | ||
Storage size | 17/100 | 78/100 | ||
Battery | 71/100 | 78/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 77/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | - /100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" or "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"
The design of Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB
The "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" is 136.0mm long, 67.2mm wide, and 11.0mm thick. It weighs 98.0g.
The design of HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB
The "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" is 146.5mm long, 71.5mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 149.8g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 10.5mm in length, 4.2mm in width, and 3mm in thickness. Both the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB". Both the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 51.8g. The "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB | HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 71/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 96/100 | 53/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 64/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"
Display of the Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB
The "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 217ppi. The "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" has a 4.5inch screen size.
Display of the HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB
The "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" uses a Super LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. In the gaming end, the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size.
In terms of display, the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" nor the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB | HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 59/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 41/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"
Camera performance of Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB
The main camera of the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" has 15.0MP.
Camera performance of HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB
The main camera of the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 2MP difference in comparison. There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, for taking photos of objects in close proximity such as desserts or food that can be posted on Instagram, the camera of "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" has a better performance. Both the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB | HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 77/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | - | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"
The processing capability of the Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB
The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
The processing capability of the HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB", the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 509MB difference in memory capacity. The "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB". The "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
The "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" than the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB". The "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB | HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 27/100 | 81/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 4/100 | 62/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"
Battery performance of Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB
The "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.
Battery performance of HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB
The "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2300.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 300mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" over the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB". Both the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB | HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 71/100 | 78/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 47/100 | 59/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"
The storage capacity of the Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB
The "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB
The "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 28GB. The "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 252GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB | HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 17/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 55/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" or "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" or "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" and the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB", the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB | HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 75/100 | 63/100 |
Display | 41/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 16/100 | 71/100 |
General rating | 43/100 | 67/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. Judging from the overall specs, the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB" and "HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Celkon A66 (2014) 4GB | HTC One A9s (2016) 32GB | |
Color | White/Black | Black/Silver/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 67.2mm x 136.0mm x 11.0mm | 71.5mm x 146.5mm x 8.0mm |
Weight | 98.0g | 149.8g |
Display size | 4.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | TFT | Super LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 854 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 217ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 2000.0mAh | 2300.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10 | |
CPU specs | 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.8GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 15.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |