Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB vs XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:20:25, Updated date: 2020-04-16 17:30:13
How are the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB | XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | |||
General rating: | 45.9/100 (The 2498th of all smartphones) | 36.8/100 (The 1817th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 55/100 | 78/100 | ||
Screen quality | 56/100 | 46/100 | ||
Performance | 28/100 | 27/100 | ||
Storage size | 35/100 | 35/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 61/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 60/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 50/100 | 50/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" or "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"
The design of Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB
The "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" is 144.8mm long, 72.8mm wide, and 10.2mm thick. It weighs 174.0g.
The design of XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB
The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is 135.8mm long, 67.2mm wide, and 7.2mm thick. It weighs 100.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 9mm in length, 5.5mm in width, and 2mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is more compact than "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 74g. The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB | XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 64/100 | 76/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 36/100 | 94/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 60/100 | 68/100 |
Compare the display of the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"
Display of the Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB
The "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB
The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 540 x 960, and the pixel density is 234ppi. The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has a 4.7inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. In the gaming end, the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" offers a more suitable screen size.
In terms of display, the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" nor the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB | XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 63/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 48/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"
Camera performance of Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB
The main camera of the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" has 10.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Camera performance of XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB
The main camera of the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 2MP difference in comparison. The "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. Also, for taking photos of objects in close proximity such as desserts or food that can be posted on Instagram, the camera of "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" has a better performance. The "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB | XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 60/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 50/100 | 50/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"
The processing capability of the Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB
The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
The processing capability of the XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" equally.
There is basically no difference between "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Neither the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" nor the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB | XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 47/100 | 44/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 12/100 | 11/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"
Battery performance of Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB
The "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.
Battery performance of XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB
The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 1800.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" over the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB". The "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB | XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 61/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 38/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"
The storage capacity of the Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB
The "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB
The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" or "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Neither the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" nor the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" or "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB".
Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB | XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 35/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 56/100 | 56/100 |
Which to buy, the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" or "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" or "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" is recommended as it has a 5.0inch screen. There isn't much difference between "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" in terms of performance or specifications. When comparing "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" overall, "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB | XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 55/100 | 78/100 |
Display | 56/100 | 46/100 |
CPU specs | 28/100 | 27/100 |
General rating | 53/100 | 48/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Is it recommended to buy the XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Lava Iris Fuel 60 8GB | XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | |
Color | Black/White | Black/White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.8mm x 144.8mm x 10.2mm | 67.2mm x 135.8mm x 7.2mm |
Weight | 174.0g | 100.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 4.7inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 540 x 960 |
Pixel density | 293ppi | 234ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 1800.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 | |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 8.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 10.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 2.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |