Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB vs Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB: Specs & Scores
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:07:34, Updated date: 2021-10-20 15:30:01
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" or "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"
The design of Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB
The "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" is 144.0mm long, 72.0mm wide, and 9.0mm thick. It weighs 150.0g.
The design of Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB
The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" is 154.0mm long, 76.5mm wide, and 8.7mm thick. It weighs 163.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 10mm in length, 4.5mm in width, and 0.3mm in thickness. "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" is bigger than "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 13g. "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" weighs less than "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and is easier to handle.
Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB | Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 68/100 | 60/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 53/100 | 44/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 62/100 | 57/100 |
Compare the display of the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"
Display of the Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB
The "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB
The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" nor the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB | Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"
Camera performance of Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB
The main camera of the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB
The main camera of the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB | Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 35/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | - | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"
The processing capability of the Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB
The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
The processing capability of the Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8952 Snapdragon 617 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.36GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB", the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 509MB difference in memory capacity. The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB". The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" than the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB". The "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB | Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 47/100 | 78/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 7/100 | 52/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"
Battery performance of Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB
The "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB
The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" is a bit better. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" over the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB". Both the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB | Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 70/100 | 78/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 44/100 | 58/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB
The "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB
The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 8GB. The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 8GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" or "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB".
Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB | Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 35/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 56/100 | 59/100 |
Which to buy, the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" or "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" or "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB"?
"Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB", the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" is overall the clear winner.
Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB | Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 62/100 | 54/100 |
Display | 48/100 | 61/100 |
CPU specs | 24/100 | 64/100 |
General rating | 45/100 | 61/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB" and "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Lava Iris Atom 3 8GB | Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB | |
Color | Black/White | White+Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.0mm x 144.0mm x 9.0mm | 76.5mm x 154.0mm x 8.7mm |
Weight | 150.0g | 163.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | TFT | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 854 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 195ppi | 267ppi |
Battery capacity | 2000.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8952 Snapdragon 617 | |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.36GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 8.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |