Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the vivo V7 (2017) 32GB or Lava Iris 356 512MB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:33:09, Updated date: 2020-04-16 22:22:19

Lava Iris 356 512MBvivo V7 (2017) 32GB
Lava Iris 356 512MBvivo V7 (2017) 32GB

How are the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" and "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Lava Iris 356 512MBvivo V7 (2017) 32GB
Lava Iris 356 512MB

vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

General rating:
Griprating-image3.8
62.5mm x 116.9mm x 12.6mm
rating-image3.2
72.8mm x 149.3mm x 7.9mm
Screen qualityrating-image1
3.5inch, 320 x 480
rating-image3.2
IPS LCD, 5.7inch, 720 x 1440
Performancerating-image1
1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores), 256.0MB
rating-image4.5
Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450, 1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores), 4.0GB
Storage sizerating-image1
512.0MB
rating-image3.9
32.0GB
Batteryrating-image3.5
1500.0mAh
rating-image4.4
3000.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image1.3
3.0MP
rating-image4.0
16.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image
rating-image5.0
24.0MP

What is the difference between the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" and the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" and "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB"

The design of Lava Iris 356 512MB

The "Lava Iris 356 512MB" is 116.9mm long, 62.5mm wide, and 12.6mm thick. It weighs 112.0g.

The design of vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is 149.3mm long, 72.8mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 139.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 32.4mm in length, 10.2mm in width, and 4.6mm in thickness. "Lava Iris 356 512MB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Lava Iris 356 512MB" is bigger than "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "Lava Iris 356 512MB" is more compact than "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 27g. The "Lava Iris 356 512MB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Lava Iris 356 512MB

vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand75/10069/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand84/10062/100
Ease of carrying around67/10062/100

Compare the display of the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" and "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB"

Display of the Lava Iris 356 512MB

The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "Lava Iris 356 512MB" has a 3.5inch screen size.

Display of the vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 282ppi. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 2.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance. In the gaming end, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

In terms of display, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" nor the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Lava Iris 356 512MB

vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?25/10073/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?15/10075/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" and "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB"

Camera performance of Lava Iris 356 512MB

The main camera of the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" has 3.0MP.

Camera performance of vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

The main camera of the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 24.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 13MP difference in comparison. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Lava Iris 356 512MB

vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?25/10080/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? - 100/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" and "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB"

The processing capability of the Lava Iris 356 512MB

The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.

The processing capability of the vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Lava Iris 356 512MB", the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 252MB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Lava Iris 356 512MB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB". The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB". The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Lava Iris 356 512MB

vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet27/10093/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games4/10088/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" and "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB"

Battery performance of Lava Iris 356 512MB

The "Lava Iris 356 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1500.0mAh.

Battery performance of vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" over the "Lava Iris 356 512MB". Both the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" and the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Lava Iris 356 512MB

vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet70/10088/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos44/10076/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" and "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB"

The storage capacity of the Lava Iris 356 512MB

The "Lava Iris 356 512MB" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 480MB. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Lava Iris 356 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 256GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Lava Iris 356 512MB

vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games2/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos54/10090/100

Which to buy, the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" or "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" or "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Lava Iris 356 512MB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.7inch makes the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and the "Lava Iris 356 512MB", the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is overall the clear winner.

Lava Iris 356 512MB

vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

Handling75/10064/100
Display18/10063/100
CPU specs15/10090/100
General rating36/10078/100

Is it recommended to buy the Lava Iris 356 512MB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the vivo V7 (2017) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" and "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" and "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Lava Iris 356 512MBvivo V7 (2017) 32GB
Lava Iris 356 512MBvivo V7 (2017) 32GB
ColorCrystal White/Black/GreyChampagne Gold/Matte Black/Energetic Blue
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)62.5mm x 116.9mm x 12.6mm72.8mm x 149.3mm x 7.9mm
Weight112.0g139.0g
Display size3.5inch5.7inch
Display typeIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)320 x 480720 x 1440
Pixel density164ppi282ppi
Battery capacity1500.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450
CPU specs1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores)1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size256.0MB4.0GB
Storage size512.0MB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution3.0MP16.0MP
Front-camera resolution24.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles