Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB or Lava Iris 349+ 512MB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:26:47, Updated date: 2022-06-02 17:18:58

Lava Iris 349+ 512MBGigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB
Lava Iris 349+ 512MBGigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB".

Lava Iris 349+ 512MBGigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB
Lava Iris 349+ 512MB

Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB

General rating:
Griprating-image3.7
74/100
rating-image2.9
57/100
Screen qualityrating-image1
18/100
rating-image2.4
48/100
Performancerating-image1
11/100
rating-image1.4
28/100
Storage sizerating-image1
2/100
rating-image1
17/100
Batteryrating-image3.0
59/100
rating-image3.2
64/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image1.0
20/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image
- /100
rating-image2.5
50/100

What is the difference between the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" and the "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB"

The design of Lava Iris 349+ 512MB

The "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" is 115.0mm long, 61.5mm wide, and 13.3mm thick. It weighs 115.4g.

The design of Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB

The "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" is 145.0mm long, 73.2mm wide, and 9.4mm thick. It weighs 165.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 30mm in length, 11.7mm in width, and 3.9mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" is more compact than "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 49.5g. The "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Lava Iris 349+ 512MB

Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB

Ease of holding it in one hand75/10065/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand82/10042/100
Ease of carrying around68/10060/100

Compare the display of the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB"

Display of the Lava Iris 349+ 512MB

The "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" has a 3.5inch screen size.

Display of the Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB

The "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

The display of "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" looks sleeker than that of "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" nor the "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Lava Iris 349+ 512MB

Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?25/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?15/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB"

Camera performance of Lava Iris 349+ 512MB

The main camera of the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" has 2.0MP.

Camera performance of Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB

The main camera of the "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 6MP difference in comparison. The "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.

Lava Iris 349+ 512MB

Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?20/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? - 50/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB"

The processing capability of the Lava Iris 349+ 512MB

The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.

The processing capability of the Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" uses the Mediatek MT6582 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB", the "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 255MB difference in memory capacity. The "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" has more memory storage, making the "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB". The "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" as it has better performance. Neither the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" nor the "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Lava Iris 349+ 512MB

Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet17/10047/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games3/10012/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB"

Battery performance of Lava Iris 349+ 512MB

The "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1400.0mAh.

Battery performance of Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB

The "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 600mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" slightly more.

If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices.

Lava Iris 349+ 512MB

Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet59/10064/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos36/10040/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB"

The storage capacity of the Lava Iris 349+ 512MB

The "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB

The "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 508MB. The "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Neither the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" nor the "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 4GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" or "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB".

Lava Iris 349+ 512MB

Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games2/10017/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos54/10055/100

Which to buy, the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" or "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" or "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" a lot easier to use. The "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" and "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" overall, "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

Lava Iris 349+ 512MB

Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB

Handling74/10057/100
Display18/10048/100
CPU specs11/10028/100
General rating34/10044/100

Is it recommended to buy the Lava Iris 349+ 512MB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Lava Iris 349+ 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Lava Iris 349+ 512MBGigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB
Lava Iris 349+ 512MBGigabyte GSmart Arty A3 4GB
ColorBrown+cool goldBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)61.5mm x 115.0mm x 13.3mm73.2mm x 145.0mm x 9.4mm
Weight115.4g165.0g
Display size3.5inch5.0inch
Display typeTFTIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)320 x 480480 x 854
Pixel density164ppi195ppi
Battery capacity1400.0mAh2000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6582
CPU specs1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size256.0MB1.0GB
Storage size512.0MB4.0GB
Rear-camera resolution2.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles