Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB or Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-09-30 21:22:18, Updated date: 2021-10-20 19:02:35

Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

How are the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.4
47/100
rating-image3.2
63/100
Screen qualityrating-image3.0
60/100
rating-image2.8
56/100
Performancerating-image2.4
48/100
rating-image2.4
47/100
Storage sizerating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image3.5
70/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
99/100
rating-image3.8
76/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image2.5
50/100

What is the difference between the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The design of Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB

The "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" is 149.5mm long, 77.0mm wide, and 10.3mm thick. It weighs 190.0g.

The design of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is 145.6mm long, 71.8mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 149.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 3.9mm in length, 5.2mm in width, and 2.3mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is more compact than "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 41g. The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand55/10070/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand26/10054/100
Ease of carrying around55/10063/100

Compare the display of the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Display of the Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB

The "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 277ppi. The "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" has a 5.3inch screen size.

Display of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" nor the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?70/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?71/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Camera performance of Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB

The main camera of the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 6.0MP.

Camera performance of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The main camera of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones.

There is a 4MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?70/10050/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The processing capability of the Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6582 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" uses the Broadcom BCM23550 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" equally.

There is basically no difference between "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used.

Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet71/10070/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games32/10031/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Battery performance of Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB

The "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" over the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Both the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet99/10076/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos93/10055/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The storage capacity of the Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB

The "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory.

The storage capacity of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" or "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 59/100

Which to buy, the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" or "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" or "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is a great choice. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". There isn't much difference between "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" in terms of performance or specifications. When comparing "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" overall, "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Handling47/10063/100
Display60/10056/100
CPU specs48/10047/100
General rating61/10056/100

Is it recommended to buy the Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
Lenovo S860 (2014) 16GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
ColorTitaniumWhite
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)77.0mm x 149.5mm x 10.3mm71.8mm x 145.6mm x 8.0mm
Weight190.0g149.0g
Display size5.3inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density277ppi293ppi
Battery capacity4000.0mAh2500.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6582Broadcom BCM23550
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution6.0MP2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles