A comparive review of the differences between the HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB and Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB. We covered a wide range of variables
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:12:18, Updated date: 2021-10-20 14:52:37
How are the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB | HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB | |||
General rating: | 54.6/100 (The 2289th of all smartphones) | 62/100 (The 256th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 66/100 | 42/100 | ||
Screen quality | 56/100 | 84/100 | ||
Performance | 47/100 | 67/100 | ||
Storage size | 70/100 | 84/100 | ||
Battery | 88/100 | 100/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 50/100 | 80/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 65/100 | 80/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" or "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"
The design of Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB
The "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" is 143.0mm long, 71.0mm wide, and 8.2mm thick. It weighs 138.0g.
The design of HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB
The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" is 161.8mm long, 83.5mm wide, and 7.8mm thick. It weighs 195.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 18.8mm in length, 12.5mm in width, and 0.3mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" for portability.
The difference in weight is 57g. The "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB | HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 70/100 | 47/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 63/100 | 22/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 63/100 | 51/100 |
Compare the display of the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"
Display of the Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB
The "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB
The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2560, and the pixel density is 492ppi. The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" has a 5.96inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.96inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB". The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB | HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 75/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 78/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"
Camera performance of Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB
The main camera of the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB
The main camera of the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB | HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 50/100 | 80/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"
The processing capability of the Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB
The CPU performance is 1.25GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB", the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB".
The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" than the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB".
Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB | HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 70/100 | 77/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 31/100 | 60/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"
Battery performance of Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB
The "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh.
Battery performance of HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB
The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 4150.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1350mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" over the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB". Both the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB | HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 88/100 | 100/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 76/100 | 99/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"
The storage capacity of the Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB
The "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB
The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 48GB. The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 1040GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB | HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 84/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 59/100 | 96/100 |
Which to buy, the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" or "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" or "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.96inch makes the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" and the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB", the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" is overall the clear winner.
Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB | HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 66/100 | 42/100 |
Display | 56/100 | 84/100 |
CPU specs | 47/100 | 67/100 |
General rating | 60/100 | 75/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB" and "HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Panasonic Eluga Tapp 16GB | HP Elite x3 (2016) 64GB | |
Color | Champagne Gold/Silver Gray | Gold/Graphite+Chrome |
OS | Android | Windows |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 71.0mm x 143.0mm x 8.2mm | 83.5mm x 161.8mm x 7.8mm |
Weight | 138.0g | 195.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 5.96inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 1440 x 2560 |
Pixel density | 293ppi | 492ppi |
Battery capacity | 2800.0mAh | 4150.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 | |
CPU specs | 1.25GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |