Plum Trigger Pro 4GB vs Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:28:09, Updated date: 2020-04-16 15:20:13
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB".
Plum Trigger Pro 4GB | Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB | |||
General rating: | 31.1/100 (The 2967th of all smartphones) | 43.6/100 (The 1655th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 78/100 | 65/100 | ||
Screen quality | 18/100 | 50/100 | ||
Performance | 16/100 | 28/100 | ||
Storage size | 17/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 61/100 | 78/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 35/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 55/100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" or "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"
The design of Plum Trigger Pro 4GB
The "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" is 114.8mm long, 60.5mm wide, and 12.2mm thick. It weighs 107.0g.
The design of Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB
The "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" is 142.7mm long, 71.7mm wide, and 7.6mm thick. It weighs 141.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 27.8mm in length, 11.2mm in width, and 4.6mm in thickness. "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" is bigger than "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" is more compact than "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 34g. The "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Plum Trigger Pro 4GB | Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 78/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 89/100 | 60/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 70/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"
Display of the Plum Trigger Pro 4GB
The "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" has a 3.5inch screen size.
Display of the Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB
The "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 540 x 960, and the pixel density is 220ppi. The "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" nor the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Plum Trigger Pro 4GB | Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 25/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 15/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"
Camera performance of Plum Trigger Pro 4GB
The main camera of the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 3.0MP.
Camera performance of Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB
The main camera of the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. The "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.
There is a 2MP difference in front camera pixel number. When taking photos of distant objects, including photos taken using a selfie stick or photos that require clear backgrounds, the camera of "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" has better performance. The "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Plum Trigger Pro 4GB | Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 35/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 55/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"
The processing capability of the Plum Trigger Pro 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" uses the Mediatek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
The processing capability of the Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6582 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB", the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 511MB difference in memory capacity. The "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB". The "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
There is basically no difference between "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" as it has better performance. Neither the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" nor the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Plum Trigger Pro 4GB | Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 27/100 | 47/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 4/100 | 12/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"
Battery performance of Plum Trigger Pro 4GB
The "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1350.0mAh.
Battery performance of Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB
The "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2420.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1070mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" over the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB". The "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
Plum Trigger Pro 4GB | Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 61/100 | 78/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 38/100 | 58/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Plum Trigger Pro 4GB
The "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB
The "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 12GB. The "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 236GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Plum Trigger Pro 4GB | Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 17/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 55/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" or "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" or "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" and the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB", the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" is overall the clear winner.
Plum Trigger Pro 4GB | Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 78/100 | 65/100 |
Display | 18/100 | 50/100 |
CPU specs | 16/100 | 28/100 |
General rating | 38/100 | 55/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Plum Trigger Pro 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Plum Trigger Pro 4GB" and "Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Plum Trigger Pro 4GB | Oppo Neo 7 (2015) 16GB | |
Color | Black/White/Red/Blue | Blue/White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 60.5mm x 114.8mm x 12.2mm | 71.7mm x 142.7mm x 7.6mm |
Weight | 107.0g | 141.0g |
Display size | 3.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 320 x 480 | 540 x 960 |
Pixel density | 164ppi | 220ppi |
Battery capacity | 1350.0mAh | 2420.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6572M | Mediatek MT6582 |
CPU specs | 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 3.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |