I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB vs. Blade S7 g05 32GB Specs & Scores
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:51:21, Updated date: 2020-04-16 19:57:09
How are the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and the "Blade S7 g05 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" or "Blade S7 g05 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and the "Blade S7 g05 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB"
The design of I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB
The "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" is 136.6mm long, 70.7mm wide, and 8.6mm thick. It weighs 132.0g.
The design of Blade S7 g05 32GB
The "Blade S7 g05 32GB" is 142.0mm long, 67.0mm wide, and 7.2mm thick. It weighs 140.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 5.4mm in length, 3.7mm in width, and 1.3mm in thickness. "Blade S7 g05 32GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Blade S7 g05 32GB" is bigger than "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 8g. "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" weighs less than "Blade S7 g05 32GB" and is easier to handle.
I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB | Blade S7 g05 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 70/100 | 76/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 68/100 | 61/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 63/100 | 68/100 |
Compare the display of the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB"
Display of the I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB
The "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 305ppi. The "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" has a 4.8inch screen size.
Display of the Blade S7 g05 32GB
The "Blade S7 g05 32GB" uses a IPS liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "Blade S7 g05 32GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "Blade S7 g05 32GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "Blade S7 g05 32GB" makes it more suited for playing games.
In terms of display, the "Blade S7 g05 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Blade S7 g05 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB". The "Blade S7 g05 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB | Blade S7 g05 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 64/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 52/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB"
Camera performance of I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB
The main camera of the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 9.0MP.
Camera performance of Blade S7 g05 32GB
The main camera of the "Blade S7 g05 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 13.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "Blade S7 g05 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Blade S7 g05 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Blade S7 g05 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 4MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Blade S7 g05 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Blade S7 g05 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Blade S7 g05 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB | Blade S7 g05 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 50/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 85/100 | 100/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB"
The processing capability of the I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8228 Snapdragon 400 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.5GB.
The processing capability of the Blade S7 g05 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Blade S7 g05 32GB" uses the Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB", the "Blade S7 g05 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1.5GB difference in memory capacity. The "Blade S7 g05 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Blade S7 g05 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Blade S7 g05 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Blade S7 g05 32GB". The "Blade S7 g05 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Blade S7 g05 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Blade S7 g05 32GB" than the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB". The "Blade S7 g05 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB | Blade S7 g05 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 63/100 | 88/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 21/100 | 71/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB"
Battery performance of I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB
The "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2100.0mAh.
Battery performance of Blade S7 g05 32GB
The "Blade S7 g05 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 400mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Blade S7 g05 32GB" over the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB". Both the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and the "Blade S7 g05 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Blade S7 g05 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB | Blade S7 g05 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 70/100 | 79/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 46/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB"
The storage capacity of the I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB
The "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Blade S7 g05 32GB
The "Blade S7 g05 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "Blade S7 g05 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Blade S7 g05 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" or "Blade S7 g05 32GB".
I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB | Blade S7 g05 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 67/100 | 65/100 |
Which to buy, the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" or "Blade S7 g05 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" or "Blade S7 g05 32GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB". Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "Blade S7 g05 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "Blade S7 g05 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Blade S7 g05 32GB" and the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB", the "Blade S7 g05 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB | Blade S7 g05 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 67/100 | 70/100 |
Display | 53/100 | 70/100 |
CPU specs | 39/100 | 80/100 |
General rating | 57/100 | 73/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Blade S7 g05 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Blade S7 g05 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Blade S7 g05 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB" and "Blade S7 g05 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
I9301I Galaxy S3 Neo 16GB | Blade S7 g05 32GB | |
Color | White/Blue | / / |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 70.7mm x 136.6mm x 8.6mm | 67.0mm x 142.0mm x 7.2mm |
Weight | 132.0g | 140.0g |
Display size | 4.8inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | IPS |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 305ppi | 440ppi |
Battery capacity | 2100.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8228 Snapdragon 400 | Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 |
CPU specs | 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.5GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 9.0MP | 13.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |