Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the ZTE Blade Force 16GB or Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:33:38, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:21:26

Galaxy S5 Neo 16GBZTE Blade Force 16GB
Galaxy S5 Neo 16GBZTE Blade Force 16GB

How are the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Galaxy S5 Neo 16GBZTE Blade Force 16GB
Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

General rating:

60.8/100

(The 2133th of all smartphones)

48.7/100

(The 1551th of all smartphones)

Grip
63/100
51/100
Screen quality
72/100
61/100
Performance
64/100
48/100
Storage size
70/100
70/100
Battery
84/100
90/100
Rear-camera resolution
80/100
50/100
Front-camera resolution
65/100
65/100

What is the difference between the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Force 16GB"

The design of Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB

The "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" is 142.0mm long, 72.5mm wide, and 8.1mm thick. It weighs 145.0g.

The design of ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is 156.0mm long, 78.0mm wide, and 9.1mm thick. It weighs 170.1g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 14mm in length, 5.5mm in width, and 1mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" is more compact than "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 25g. The "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand69/10056/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand57/10039/100
Ease of carrying around62/10055/100

Compare the display of the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Force 16GB"

Display of the Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB

The "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 431ppi. The "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" has a 5.1inch screen size.

Display of the ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.4inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" makes it more suited for playing games. The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". The "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?69/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?65/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Force 16GB"

Camera performance of Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?80/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Force 16GB"

The processing capability of the Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" uses the Exynos 7580 Octa SoC. The CPU performance is 1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8920 Snapdragon 427 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB", the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB". The "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" than the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB".

Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet80/10071/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games47/10033/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Force 16GB"

Battery performance of Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB

The "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh.

Battery performance of ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" slightly more. Both the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet84/10090/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos68/10079/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Force 16GB"

The storage capacity of the Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB

The "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" or "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 128GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10076/100

Which to buy, the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" or "ZTE Blade Force 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" or "ZTE Blade Force 16GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.1inch makes the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" overall, "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Handling63/10051/100
Display72/10061/100
CPU specs64/10048/100
General rating68/10060/100

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade Force 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Galaxy S5 Neo 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Galaxy S5 Neo 16GBZTE Blade Force 16GB
Galaxy S5 Neo 16GBZTE Blade Force 16GB
ColorBlack/Gray/GoldBlue
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)72.5mm x 142.0mm x 8.1mm78.0mm x 156.0mm x 9.1mm
Weight145.0g170.1g
Display size5.1inch5.5inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 1920720 x 1280
Pixel density431ppi267ppi
Battery capacity2800.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetExynos 7580 OctaQualcomm MSM8920 Snapdragon 427
CPU specs1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution16.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles