Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB and Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB review
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:32:24, Updated date: 2020-04-16 19:11:06
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB".
Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB | Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB | |||
General rating: | 42.6/100 (The 2609th of all smartphones) | 56.2/100 (The 1369th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 71/100 | 55/100 | ||
Screen quality | 38/100 | 56/100 | ||
Performance | 13/100 | 48/100 | ||
Storage size | 17/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 68/100 | 92/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 77/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | - /100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" or "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
The design of Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB
The "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" is 129.7mm long, 65.9mm wide, and 9.4mm thick. It weighs 129.0g.
The design of Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB
The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" is 146.2mm long, 73.3mm wide, and 9.7mm thick. It weighs 172.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 16.5mm in length, 7.3mm in width, and 0.2mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" is more compact than "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 43g. The "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB | Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 75/100 | 64/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 70/100 | 38/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 67/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the display of the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
Display of the Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB
The "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 216ppi. The "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" has a 4.3inch screen size.
Display of the Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB
The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. In the gaming end, the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size.
In terms of display, the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" nor the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB | Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 56/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 33/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
Camera performance of Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB
The main camera of the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" has 15.0MP.
Camera performance of Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB
The main camera of the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 2MP difference in comparison. There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, for taking photos of objects in close proximity such as desserts or food that can be posted on Instagram, the camera of "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" has a better performance. Both the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB | Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 77/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | - | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
The processing capability of the Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" uses the Cortex-A7 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×1(1.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
The processing capability of the Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" uses the Exynos 7570 Quad SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB", the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 510MB difference in memory capacity. The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB". The "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" than the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB". The "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB | Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 18/100 | 71/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 3/100 | 33/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
Battery performance of Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB
The "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1800.0mAh.
Battery performance of Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB
The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" over the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB". The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB | Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 68/100 | 92/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 43/100 | 82/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB
The "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB
The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 12GB. The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 236GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB | Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 17/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 55/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" or "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" or "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" and the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB", the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" is overall the clear winner.
Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB | Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 71/100 | 55/100 |
Display | 38/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 13/100 | 48/100 |
General rating | 40/100 | 62/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. Judging from the overall specs, the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Galaxy Star 2 Plus 4GB | Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB | |
Color | Black/White | Gray |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 65.9mm x 129.7mm x 9.4mm | 73.3mm x 146.2mm x 9.7mm |
Weight | 129.0g | 172.0g |
Display size | 4.3inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | TFT | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 800 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 216ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 1800.0mAh | 2800.0mAh |
Chipset | Cortex-A7 | Exynos 7570 Quad |
CPU specs | 1.2GHz×1(1.0-cores) | 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 15.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |