A comparive review of the differences between the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB and Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB. We covered a wide range of variables
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:48:55, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:00:37
How are the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |||
General rating: | 40.3/100 (The 2681th of all smartphones) | 56.8/100 (The 422th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 72/100 | 62/100 | ||
Screen quality | 34/100 | 70/100 | ||
Performance | 20/100 | 51/100 | ||
Storage size | 17/100 | 84/100 | ||
Battery | 72/100 | 81/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 35/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | - /100 | 46/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" or "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
The design of Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB
The "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" is 121.4mm long, 62.9mm wide, and 11.0mm thick. It weighs 130.3g.
The design of ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is 139.0mm long, 69.0mm wide, and 9.8mm thick. It weighs 158.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 17.5mm in length, 6.1mm in width, and 1.1mm in thickness. "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" is bigger than "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 27.6g. The "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 77/100 | 71/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 69/100 | 47/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 68/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the display of the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
Display of the Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB
The "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" has a 4.0inch screen size.
Display of the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. In the gaming end, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB". The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 46/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 25/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
Camera performance of Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB
The main camera of the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
The main camera of the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has 13.1MP. The front camera has 1.25MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 8.1MP difference in comparison. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 35/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | - | 46/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
The processing capability of the Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB
The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
The processing capability of the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" uses the Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T SoC. The CPU performance is 1.7GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB", the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". The "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" than the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB". The "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 27/100 | 73/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 9/100 | 35/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
Battery performance of Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB
The "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1800.0mAh.
Battery performance of ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3020.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1220mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" over the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB". Both the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 72/100 | 81/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 48/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
The storage capacity of the Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB
The "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 60GB. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 60GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is recommended over "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 17/100 | 84/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 65/100 | 75/100 |
Which to buy, the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" or "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" or "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"?
"Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" and the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB", the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is overall the clear winner.
Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 72/100 | 62/100 |
Display | 34/100 | 70/100 |
CPU specs | 20/100 | 51/100 |
General rating | 42/100 | 66/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Galaxy Ace 4 LTE G313 4GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |
Color | Iris Charcoal/Classic White | / / / |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 62.9mm x 121.4mm x 11.0mm | 69.0mm x 139.0mm x 9.8mm |
Weight | 130.3g | 158.0g |
Display size | 4.0inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | TFT | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 800 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 233ppi | 440ppi |
Battery capacity | 1800.0mAh | 3020.0mAh |
Chipset | Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T | |
CPU specs | 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.7GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 13.1MP |
Front-camera resolution | 1.25MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |