Compare vivo X5 (2014) 16GB vs MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:15:37, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:54:03
How are the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and the "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" or "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and the "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB"
The design of vivo X5 (2014) 16GB
The "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" is 143.3mm long, 71.1mm wide, and 6.3mm thick. It weighs 141.0g.
The design of MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB
The "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" is 136.0mm long, 69.0mm wide, and 8.8mm thick. It weighs 138.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 7.3mm in length, 2mm in width, and 2.5mm in thickness. Both the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB". Both the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 3g. There is very little difference in weight between the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 72/100 | 71/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 60/100 | 63/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 65/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB"
Display of the vivo X5 (2014) 16GB
The "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB
The "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 312ppi. The "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" has a 4.7inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. In the gaming end, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size.
The display of "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" looks sleeker than that of "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. The "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 63/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 48/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB"
Camera performance of vivo X5 (2014) 16GB
The main camera of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB
The main camera of the "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" has 13.3MP. The front camera has 4.9MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 0.3MP difference in comparison. There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and the "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 73/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 64/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB"
The processing capability of the vivo X5 (2014) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" uses the Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and the "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and the "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" equally.
There is basically no difference between "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used.
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 74/100 | 75/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 37/100 | 38/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB"
Battery performance of vivo X5 (2014) 16GB
The "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2250.0mAh.
Battery performance of MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB
The "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2440.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 190mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" over the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB". Both the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and the "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 72/100 | 84/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 48/100 | 69/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo X5 (2014) 16GB
The "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB
The "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" or "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 128GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and the "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 76/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" or "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" or "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB". If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB". There isn't much difference between "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 67/100 | 67/100 |
Display | 56/100 | 53/100 |
CPU specs | 54/100 | 55/100 |
General rating | 61/100 | 63/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo X5 (2014) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | MONO MO-01J docomo 16GB | |
Color | White | White/Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 71.1mm x 143.3mm x 6.3mm | 69.0mm x 136.0mm x 8.8mm |
Weight | 141.0g | 138.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 4.7inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 293ppi | 312ppi |
Battery capacity | 2250.0mAh | 2440.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 | Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 |
CPU specs | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.3MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 4.9MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |