Vivo X5 (2014) 16GB vs ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:14:31, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:52:57
Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" or "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"
The design of vivo X5 (2014) 16GB
The "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" is 143.3mm long, 71.1mm wide, and 6.3mm thick. It weighs 141.0g.
The design of ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB
The "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" is 166.1mm long, 84.6mm wide, and 8.4mm thick. It weighs 175.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 22.7mm in length, 13.5mm in width, and 2.1mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" for portability.
The difference in weight is 34g. The "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 72/100 | 44/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 60/100 | 36/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 65/100 | 49/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"
Display of the vivo X5 (2014) 16GB
The "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB
The "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 367ppi. The "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB". The "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 76/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 78/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"
Camera performance of vivo X5 (2014) 16GB
The main camera of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 80/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"
The processing capability of the vivo X5 (2014) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8940 Snapdragon 435 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" are not large at all. For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" edges out the competition. The "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" as it has better performance.
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 74/100 | 78/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 37/100 | 43/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"
Battery performance of vivo X5 (2014) 16GB
The "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2250.0mAh.
Battery performance of ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB
The "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" has a battery capacity of 4080.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1830mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" over the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB". Both the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 72/100 | 100/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 48/100 | 100/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo X5 (2014) 16GB
The "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB
The "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 112GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 78/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" or "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" or "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.0inch makes the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" a lot easier to use. "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. When comparing "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" overall, "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 67/100 | 43/100 |
Display | 56/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 54/100 | 61/100 |
General rating | 61/100 | 71/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo X5 (2014) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" and "ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | ZTE Blade Z Max 32GB | |
Color | White | Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 71.1mm x 143.3mm x 6.3mm | 84.6mm x 166.1mm x 8.4mm |
Weight | 141.0g | 175.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 6.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 293ppi | 367ppi |
Battery capacity | 2250.0mAh | 4080.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 | Qualcomm MSM8940 Snapdragon 435 |
CPU specs | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |