Compare vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB vs LG X style (2016) 16GB
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:26:14, Updated date: 2021-10-20 14:03:53
Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB".
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | LG X style (2016) 16GB | |||
General rating: | 56.2/100 (The 2245th of all smartphones) | 48.1/100 (The 1563th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 62/100 | 70/100 | ||
Screen quality | 74/100 | 56/100 | ||
Performance | 69/100 | 37/100 | ||
Storage size | 78/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 76/100 | 74/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 80/100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and the "LG X style (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" or "LG X style (2016) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and the "LG X style (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB"
The design of vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB
The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is 146.5mm long, 73.3mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 148.0g.
The design of LG X style (2016) 16GB
The "LG X style (2016) 16GB" is 144.8mm long, 71.4mm wide, and 6.9mm thick. It weighs 121.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 1.6mm in length, 1.8mm in width, and 1mm in thickness. Both the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. "LG X style (2016) 16GB" is bigger than "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 27g. The "LG X style (2016) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | LG X style (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 68/100 | 71/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 55/100 | 77/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 62/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB"
Display of the vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB
The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.
Display of the LG X style (2016) 16GB
The "LG X style (2016) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "LG X style (2016) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "LG X style (2016) 16GB". The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | LG X style (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 70/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 70/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB"
Camera performance of vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB
The main camera of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of LG X style (2016) 16GB
The main camera of the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | LG X style (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB"
The processing capability of the vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8974AA Snapdragon 801 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the LG X style (2016) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.5GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "LG X style (2016) 16GB", the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1.5GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "LG X style (2016) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB". The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" than the "LG X style (2016) 16GB". The "LG X style (2016) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | LG X style (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 80/100 | 59/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 58/100 | 21/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB"
Battery performance of vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB
The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2600.0mAh.
Battery performance of LG X style (2016) 16GB
The "LG X style (2016) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2100.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is a bit better. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and the "LG X style (2016) 16GB". Both the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices.
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | LG X style (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 76/100 | 74/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 55/100 | 52/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB
The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the LG X style (2016) 16GB
The "LG X style (2016) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" or "LG X style (2016) 16GB". Both the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | LG X style (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" or "LG X style (2016) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" or "LG X style (2016) 16GB"?
"LG X style (2016) 16GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.2inch makes the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and the "LG X style (2016) 16GB", the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | LG X style (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 62/100 | 70/100 |
Display | 74/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 69/100 | 37/100 |
General rating | 70/100 | 58/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the LG X style (2016) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | LG X style (2016) 16GB | |
Color | White+Black | Black/White/Titan |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.3mm x 146.5mm x 8.0mm | 71.4mm x 144.8mm x 6.9mm |
Weight | 148.0g | 121.0g |
Display size | 5.2inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 423ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 2600.0mAh | 2100.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8974AA Snapdragon 801 | Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 |
CPU specs | 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 1.5GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |