Verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB vs Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:09:17, Updated date: 2020-04-16 14:21:52
How are the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB | Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB | |||
General rating: | 25.3/100 (The 2999th of all smartphones) | 41.4/100 (The 1699th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 81/100 | 46/100 | ||
Screen quality | 18/100 | 61/100 | ||
Performance | 16/100 | 28/100 | ||
Storage size | 2/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 45/100 | 78/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 20/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | - /100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" or "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"
The design of verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB
The "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" is 113.4mm long, 60.2mm wide, and 12.5mm thick. It weighs 88.5g.
The design of Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB
The "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" is 155.0mm long, 79.1mm wide, and 10.0mm thick. It weighs 185.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 41.5mm in length, 18.8mm in width, and 2.5mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" for portability.
The difference in weight is 96.5g. The "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB | Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 78/100 | 52/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 100/100 | 29/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 70/100 | 53/100 |
Compare the display of the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"
Display of the verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB
The "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" has a 3.5inch screen size.
Display of the Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB
The "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance. In the gaming end, the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
In terms of display, the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" nor the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB | Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 25/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 15/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"
Camera performance of verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB
The main camera of the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" has 2.0MP.
Camera performance of Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB
The main camera of the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 6MP difference in comparison. The "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.
verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB | Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 20/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | - | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"
The processing capability of the verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" uses the Mediatek MT6571 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.
The processing capability of the Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6580M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB", the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 255MB difference in memory capacity. The "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB". The "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
There is basically no difference between "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" as it has better performance. Neither the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" nor the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB | Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 28/100 | 47/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 4/100 | 12/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"
Battery performance of verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB
The "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB
The "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" over the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB". The "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB | Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 45/100 | 78/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 23/100 | 58/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB
The "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB
The "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 496MB. The "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 48GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content.
verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB | Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 2/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 54/100 | 67/100 |
Which to buy, the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" or "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" or "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" and the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB", the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" is overall the clear winner.
verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB | Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 81/100 | 46/100 |
Display | 18/100 | 61/100 |
CPU specs | 16/100 | 28/100 |
General rating | 33/100 | 53/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" looks compact, and is quite excellent in its ease of being held. It is recommended if you are looking for a device that can be easily operated and held with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Is it recommended to buy the Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB" and "Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
verykool s3501 Lynx 512MB | Wiko Robby (2016) 16GB | |
Color | Yellow/Blue | Space Grey/Gold/Bleen/Rose Gold/Lime |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 60.2mm x 113.4mm x 12.5mm | 79.1mm x 155.0mm x 10.0mm |
Weight | 88.5g | 185.0g |
Display size | 3.5inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | TFT | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 320 x 480 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 164ppi | 267ppi |
Battery capacity | 1000.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6571 | Mediatek MT6580M |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 256.0MB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 512.0MB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 2.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |