Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB or Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-09-30 21:25:54, Updated date: 2020-04-16 16:02:33

Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

General rating:

35.5/100

(The 2838th of all smartphones)

50.3/100

(The 1506th of all smartphones)

Grip
56/100
54/100
Screen quality
56/100
61/100
Performance
28/100
48/100
Storage size
17/100
70/100
Battery
64/100
90/100
Rear-camera resolution
50/100
72/100
Front-camera resolution
50/100
65/100

What is the difference between the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

The design of Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB

The "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" is 146.0mm long, 74.0mm wide, and 9.3mm thick. It weighs 167.0g.

The design of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 156.0mm long, 77.5mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 156.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 10mm in length, 3.5mm in width, and 0.4mm in thickness. "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" is bigger than "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 11g. "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" weighs less than "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" and is easier to handle.

Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand64/10057/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand41/10048/100
Ease of carrying around59/10056/100

Compare the display of the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

Display of the Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB

The "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Display of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The display of "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" looks sleeker than that of "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" nor the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?68/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?60/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

Camera performance of Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB

The main camera of the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Camera performance of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?50/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

The processing capability of the Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" uses the Mediatek MT6582 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

The processing capability of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB", the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" than the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB". The "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet47/10071/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games12/10033/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

Battery performance of Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB

The "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.

Battery performance of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" over the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB". The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet64/10090/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos40/10079/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

The storage capacity of the Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB

The "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 12GB. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 236GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games17/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos55/10090/100

Which to buy, the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" or "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" or "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". If you want a larger screen, "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is recommended as it has a 5.5inch screen. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB", the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is overall the clear winner.

Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Handling56/10054/100
Display56/10061/100
CPU specs28/10048/100
General rating45/10063/100

Is it recommended to buy the Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
Wiko Rainbow (2014) 4GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
ColorBlack/White/Bleen/Yellow/Fuschia/Coral/VioletBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)74.0mm x 146.0mm x 9.3mm77.5mm x 156.0mm x 8.9mm
Weight167.0g156.0g
Display size5.0inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density293ppi267ppi
Battery capacity2000.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6582Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB2.0GB
Storage size4.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution2.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles