Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Wiko Highway Signs 8GB vs. ZTE mamorino4 (2018) Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:38:51, Updated date: 2020-04-16 15:39:14

Wiko Highway Signs 8GBZTE mamorino4 (2018)
Wiko Highway Signs 8GBZTE mamorino4 (2018)

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" and "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" and "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)".

Wiko Highway Signs 8GBZTE mamorino4 (2018)
Wiko Highway Signs 8GB

ZTE mamorino4 (2018)

General rating:
Griprating-image3.6
72/100
rating-image4.0
80/100
Screen qualityrating-image2.7
53/100
rating-image1
6/100
Performancerating-image2.0
40/100
rating-image1.1
22/100
Storage sizerating-image1.8
35/100
rating-image1
17/100
Batteryrating-image3.5
69/100
rating-image4.0
80/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image
- /100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
65/100
rating-image
- /100

What is the difference between the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" and the "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" and "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)"

The design of Wiko Highway Signs 8GB

The "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" is 138.0mm long, 68.0mm wide, and 7.6mm thick. It weighs 124.0g.

The design of ZTE mamorino4 (2018)

The "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" is 99.0mm long, 56.0mm wide, and 15.5mm thick. It weighs 105.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 39mm in length, 12mm in width, and 7.9mm in thickness. "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" is bigger than "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" and "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 19g. The "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Wiko Highway Signs 8GB

ZTE mamorino4 (2018)

Ease of holding it in one hand74/10080/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand74/10090/100
Ease of carrying around67/10071/100

Compare the display of the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" and "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)"

Display of the Wiko Highway Signs 8GB

The "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 312ppi. The "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" has a 4.7inch screen size.

Display of the ZTE mamorino4 (2018)

The "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 280, and the pixel density is 151ppi. The "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" has a 2.8inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1.9inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)". The "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Wiko Highway Signs 8GB

ZTE mamorino4 (2018)

How suited is the screen for usual usage?63/1000/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?48/1000/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" and "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)"

Camera performance of Wiko Highway Signs 8GB

The main camera of the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of ZTE mamorino4 (2018)

Which camera performance is better?

Wiko Highway Signs 8GB

ZTE mamorino4 (2018)

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/100 -
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/100 -

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" and "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)"

The processing capability of the Wiko Highway Signs 8GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" uses the Mediatek MT6592M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

The processing capability of the ZTE mamorino4 (2018)

The CPU performance is 1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)", the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 511GB difference in memory capacity. The "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" has more memory storage, making the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB".

The "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" than the "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)". Neither the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" nor the "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Wiko Highway Signs 8GB

ZTE mamorino4 (2018)

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet71/10041/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games17/1006/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" and "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)"

Battery performance of Wiko Highway Signs 8GB

The "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.

Battery performance of ZTE mamorino4 (2018)

The "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" has a battery capacity of 1200.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 800mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" over the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB". The "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.

Wiko Highway Signs 8GB

ZTE mamorino4 (2018)

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet69/10080/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos44/10063/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" and "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)"

The storage capacity of the Wiko Highway Signs 8GB

The "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the ZTE mamorino4 (2018)

The "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" has 4.0GB of internal memory.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 4GB. The "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" unfortunately falls behind here. Neither the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" nor the "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Wiko Highway Signs 8GB

ZTE mamorino4 (2018)

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games35/10017/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos56/100 -

Which to buy, the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" or "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" or "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)"?

"ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 4.7inch makes the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" a lot easier to use. The "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" and the "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)", the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" is overall the clear winner.

Wiko Highway Signs 8GB

ZTE mamorino4 (2018)

Handling72/10080/100
Display53/1006/100
CPU specs40/10022/100
General rating52/10042/100

Is it recommended to buy the Wiko Highway Signs 8GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE mamorino4 (2018), compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" looks compact, and is quite excellent in its ease of being held. It is recommended if you are looking for a device that can be easily operated and held with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" and "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Wiko Highway Signs 8GB" and "ZTE mamorino4 (2018)". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Wiko Highway Signs 8GBZTE mamorino4 (2018)
Wiko Highway Signs 8GBZTE mamorino4 (2018)
ColorWhite/Coral/Grey/Electric blue/Purple/ /
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)68.0mm x 138.0mm x 7.6mm56.0mm x 99.0mm x 15.5mm
Weight124.0g105.0g
Display size4.7inch2.8inch
Display typeIPS LCDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280320 x 280
Pixel density312ppi151ppi
Battery capacity2000.0mAh1200.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6592M
CPU specs1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB512.0MB
Storage size8.0GB4.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles