A comparive review of the differences between the Blade V580 16GB and Yezz Andy 3.5EH. We covered a wide range of variables
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:44:44, Updated date: 2020-04-04 12:51:34
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Blade V580 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Blade V580 16GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and the "Blade V580 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Blade V580 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Blade V580 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Blade V580 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Blade V580 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Blade V580 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Blade V580 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" or "Blade V580 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Blade V580 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and the "Blade V580 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Blade V580 16GB"
The design of Yezz Andy 3.5EH
The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is 115.5mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 12.5mm thick. It weighs 115.0g.
The design of Blade V580 16GB
The "Blade V580 16GB" is 155.3mm long, 77.2mm wide, and 8.6mm thick. It weighs 165.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 39.8mm in length, 15.2mm in width, and 3.9mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Blade V580 16GB" for portability.
The difference in weight is 50g. The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | Blade V580 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 76/100 | 59/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 82/100 | 42/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 68/100 | 57/100 |
Compare the display of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Blade V580 16GB"
Display of the Yezz Andy 3.5EH
The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" uses a LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has a 3.5inch screen size.
Display of the Blade V580 16GB
The "Blade V580 16GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "Blade V580 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Blade V580 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Blade V580 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" shows only an unsatisfactory performance. In the gaming end, the "Blade V580 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Blade V580 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
In terms of display, the "Blade V580 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Blade V580 16GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH". The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | Blade V580 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 25/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 15/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Blade V580 16GB"
Camera performance of Yezz Andy 3.5EH
The main camera of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has 3.2MP. The front camera has 1.3MP.
Camera performance of Blade V580 16GB
The main camera of the "Blade V580 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 9.8MP difference in comparison. The "Blade V580 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Blade V580 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Blade V580 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3.7MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Blade V580 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Blade V580 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | Blade V580 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 26/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 46/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Blade V580 16GB"
The processing capability of the Yezz Andy 3.5EH
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" uses the Mediatek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.
The processing capability of the Blade V580 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Blade V580 16GB" uses the MT6753 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH", the "Blade V580 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 254MB difference in memory capacity. The "Blade V580 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "Blade V580 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Blade V580 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Blade V580 16GB". The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
The "Blade V580 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Blade V580 16GB" than the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH". The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | Blade V580 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 24/100 | 77/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 4/100 | 41/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Blade V580 16GB"
Battery performance of Yezz Andy 3.5EH
The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has a battery capacity of 1300.0mAh.
Battery performance of Blade V580 16GB
The "Blade V580 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1700mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Blade V580 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Blade V580 16GB" over the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH". The "Blade V580 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Blade V580 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Blade V580 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | Blade V580 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 59/100 | 87/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 36/100 | 74/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Blade V580 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Yezz Andy 3.5EH
The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Blade V580 16GB
The "Blade V580 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 496MB. The "Blade V580 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Blade V580 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is recommended over "Blade V580 16GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos.
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | Blade V580 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 2/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 65/100 | 59/100 |
Which to buy, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" or "Blade V580 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" or "Blade V580 16GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Blade V580 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "Blade V580 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Blade V580 16GB" and the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH", the "Blade V580 16GB" is overall the clear winner.
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | Blade V580 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 75/100 | 53/100 |
Display | 18/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 14/100 | 59/100 |
General rating | 35/100 | 64/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Yezz Andy 3.5EH, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Blade V580 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Blade V580 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Blade V580 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Blade V580 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Blade V580 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | Blade V580 16GB | |
Color | black,white,blue,green,fuschia | / |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 62.0mm x 115.5mm x 12.5mm | 77.2mm x 155.3mm x 8.6mm |
Weight | 115.0g | 165.0g |
Display size | 3.5inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 320 x 480 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 164ppi | 400ppi |
Battery capacity | 1300.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6572M | MT6753 |
CPU specs | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 256.0MB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 512.0MB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 3.2MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 1.3MP | 5.0MP |