Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB or Yezz Andy 3.5EH? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-09-30 21:42:02, Updated date: 2020-04-04 18:22:02

Yezz Andy 3.5EHAQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB
Yezz Andy 3.5EHAQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB".

Yezz Andy 3.5EHAQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB
Yezz Andy 3.5EHAQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB

General rating:

32.5/100

(The 2935th of all smartphones)

60.7/100

(The 296th of all smartphones)

Grip
75/100
73/100
Screen quality
18/100
67/100
Performance
14/100
68/100
Storage size
2/100
70/100
Battery
59/100
88/100
Rear-camera resolution
26/100
72/100
Front-camera resolution
46/100
65/100

What is the difference between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB"

The design of Yezz Andy 3.5EH

The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is 115.5mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 12.5mm thick. It weighs 115.0g.

The design of AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB

The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" is 126.0mm long, 66.0mm wide, and 9.0mm thick. It weighs 120.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 10.5mm in length, 4mm in width, and 3.5mm in thickness. Both the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB". Both the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 5g. There is very little difference in weight between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.

Yezz Andy 3.5EH

AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand76/10075/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand82/10078/100
Ease of carrying around68/10067/100

Compare the display of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB"

Display of the Yezz Andy 3.5EH

The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" uses a LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has a 3.5inch screen size.

Display of the AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB

The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" uses a IGZO liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 468ppi. The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" has a 4.7inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH". The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Yezz Andy 3.5EH

AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?25/10063/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?15/10048/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB"

Camera performance of Yezz Andy 3.5EH

The main camera of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has 3.2MP. The front camera has 1.3MP.

Camera performance of AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB

The main camera of the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" has 13.1MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 9.8MP difference in comparison. The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3.7MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Yezz Andy 3.5EH

AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?26/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?46/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB"

The processing capability of the Yezz Andy 3.5EH

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" uses the Mediatek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.

The processing capability of the AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" uses the Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 SoC. The CPU performance is 2GHz+1.6GHz×6(6.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH", the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 253MB difference in memory capacity. The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB". The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" than the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH". The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Yezz Andy 3.5EH

AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet24/10079/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games4/10054/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB"

Battery performance of Yezz Andy 3.5EH

The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has a battery capacity of 1300.0mAh.

Battery performance of AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB

The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2810.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1510mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" over the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH". The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Yezz Andy 3.5EH

AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet59/10088/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos36/10076/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB"

The storage capacity of the Yezz Andy 3.5EH

The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB

The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 200.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 496MB. The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 152GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Yezz Andy 3.5EH

AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games2/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos65/10085/100

Which to buy, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" or "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" or "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB". Its perfect screen size of 4.7inch makes the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" and the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH", the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" is overall the clear winner.

Yezz Andy 3.5EH

AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB

Handling75/10073/100
Display18/10067/100
CPU specs14/10068/100
General rating35/10069/100

Is it recommended to buy the Yezz Andy 3.5EH, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "AQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Yezz Andy 3.5EHAQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB
Yezz Andy 3.5EHAQUOS Compact SH-02H docomo 16GB
Colorblack,white,blue,green,fuschiaYellow×Silver/Blue×Black
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)62.0mm x 115.5mm x 12.5mm66.0mm x 126.0mm x 9.0mm
Weight115.0g120.0g
Display size3.5inch4.7inch
Display typeLCDIGZO
Screen resolution (width x height)320 x 4801080 x 1920
Pixel density164ppi468ppi
Battery capacity1300.0mAh2810.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6572MSnapdragon 808 MSM8992
CPU specs1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores)2GHz+1.6GHz×6(6.0-cores)
RAM size256.0MB3.0GB
Storage size512.0MB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution3.2MP13.1MP
Front-camera resolution1.3MP5.0MP

Check price

New articles