Yezz Andy 3.5EH vs BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:49:03, Updated date: 2020-04-16 16:50:42
How are the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB | |||
General rating: | 32.5/100 (The 2935th of all smartphones) | 37/100 (The 2789th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 75/100 | 52/100 | ||
Screen quality | 18/100 | 56/100 | ||
Performance | 14/100 | 28/100 | ||
Storage size | 2/100 | 17/100 | ||
Battery | 59/100 | 69/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 26/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 46/100 | 50/100 |
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" or "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"
The design of Yezz Andy 3.5EH
The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is 115.5mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 12.5mm thick. It weighs 115.0g.
The design of BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB
The "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" is 156.0mm long, 77.6mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 166.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 40.5mm in length, 15.5mm in width, and 3.5mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" for portability.
The difference in weight is 51g. The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 76/100 | 57/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 82/100 | 42/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 68/100 | 56/100 |
Compare the display of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"
Display of the Yezz Andy 3.5EH
The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" uses a LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has a 3.5inch screen size.
Display of the BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB
The "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 540 x 960, and the pixel density is 200ppi. The "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" shows only an unsatisfactory performance. In the gaming end, the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
In terms of display, the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" nor the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 25/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 15/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"
Camera performance of Yezz Andy 3.5EH
The main camera of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has 3.2MP. The front camera has 1.3MP.
Camera performance of BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB
The main camera of the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 4.8MP difference in comparison. The "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.
There is a 0.7MP difference in front camera pixel number. When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 26/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 46/100 | 50/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"
The processing capability of the Yezz Andy 3.5EH
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" uses the Mediatek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.
The processing capability of the BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" uses the Mediatek MT6582M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH", the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 255MB difference in memory capacity. The "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" has more memory storage, making the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB". The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" as it has better performance. Neither the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" nor the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 24/100 | 47/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 4/100 | 12/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"
Battery performance of Yezz Andy 3.5EH
The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has a battery capacity of 1300.0mAh.
Battery performance of BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB
The "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" has a battery capacity of 2350.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1050mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" over the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH".
The battery life of the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 59/100 | 69/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 36/100 | 44/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"
The storage capacity of the Yezz Andy 3.5EH
The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB
The "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 508MB. The "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Neither the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" nor the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 4GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" or "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB".
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 2/100 | 17/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 65/100 | 65/100 |
Which to buy, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" or "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" or "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" a lot easier to use. The "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" and "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" overall, "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 75/100 | 52/100 |
Display | 18/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 14/100 | 28/100 |
General rating | 35/100 | 45/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Yezz Andy 3.5EH, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Is it recommended to buy the BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | BLU Studio 5.5 S 4GB | |
Color | black,white,blue,green,fuschia | White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 62.0mm x 115.5mm x 12.5mm | 77.6mm x 156.0mm x 8.9mm |
Weight | 115.0g | 166.0g |
Display size | 3.5inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 320 x 480 | 540 x 960 |
Pixel density | 164ppi | 200ppi |
Battery capacity | 1300.0mAh | 2350.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6572M | Mediatek MT6582M |
CPU specs | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 256.0MB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 512.0MB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 3.2MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 1.3MP | 2.0MP |