Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB or Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:39:49, Updated date: 2020-04-16 18:25:40

Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GBAQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB
Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GBAQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB

How are the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GBAQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB
Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB

AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB

General rating:

29.5/100

(The 2983th of all smartphones)

37.3/100

(The 859th of all smartphones)

Grip
75/100
69/100
Screen quality
18/100
32/100
Performance
15/100
14/100
Storage size
17/100
8/100
Battery
59/100
46/100
Rear-camera resolution
35/100
50/100
Front-camera resolution
55/100
40/100

What is the difference between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" and the "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB"

The design of Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB

The "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" is 115.5mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 12.5mm thick. It weighs 115.0g.

The design of AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB

The "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" is 121.0mm long, 57.0mm wide, and 15.0mm thick. It weighs 155.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 5.5mm in length, 5mm in width, and 2.5mm in thickness. Both the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB". Both the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 40g. The "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB

AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB

Ease of holding it in one hand76/10079/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand82/10049/100
Ease of carrying around68/10071/100

Compare the display of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB"

Display of the Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB

The "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" uses a LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" has a 3.5inch screen size.

Display of the AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB

The "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" uses a New ASV liquid crystal. The resolution is 540 x 960, and the pixel density is 297ppi. The "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" has a 3.7inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Neither the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" nor the "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

In terms of display, the "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB". Neither the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" nor the "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB

AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?25/10033/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?15/10019/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB"

Camera performance of Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB

The main camera of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 3.0MP.

Camera performance of AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB

The main camera of the "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 0.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. The "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB

AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?35/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?55/10040/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB"

The processing capability of the Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" uses the Mediatek MT6572 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.

The processing capability of the AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" uses the Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×1(1.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" and the "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" and the "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" equally. Neither the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" nor the "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

There is basically no difference between "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Neither the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" nor the "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB

AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet24/10020/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games4/1003/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB"

Battery performance of Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB

The "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1300.0mAh.

Battery performance of AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB

The "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" has a battery capacity of 1370.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 70mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" over the "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB".

The battery life of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB

AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet59/10046/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos36/10024/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB"

The storage capacity of the Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB

The "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB

The "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" has 2.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 2GB. "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Neither the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" nor the "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 34GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content.

Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB

AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games17/1008/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos65/10054/100

Which to buy, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" or "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" or "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB"?

"Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 3.7inch makes the "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" a lot easier to use. There isn't much difference between "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB

AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB

Handling75/10069/100
Display18/10032/100
CPU specs15/10014/100
General rating38/10037/100

Is it recommended to buy the Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GBAQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB
Yezz Andy 3.5EI 4GBAQUOS PHONE Slider SH-02D docomo 2GB
ColorBlack/White/Blue/Green/OrangeGold/White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)62.0mm x 115.5mm x 12.5mm57.0mm x 121.0mm x 15.0mm
Weight115.0g155.0g
Display size3.5inch3.7inch
Display typeLCDNew ASV
Screen resolution (width x height)320 x 480540 x 960
Pixel density164ppi297ppi
Battery capacity1300.0mAh1370.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6572Snapdragon S2 MSM8255
CPU specs1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores)1.5GHz×1(1.0-cores)
RAM size512.0MB512.0MB
Storage size4.0GB2.0GB
Rear-camera resolution5.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution3.0MP0.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles