A comparive review of the differences between the Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB and ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB. We covered a wide range of variables
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:27:34, Updated date: 2021-10-20 17:33:20
Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB".
ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | |||
General rating: | 57/100 (The 2218th of all smartphones) | 44.3/100 (The 2546th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 63/100 | 68/100 | ||
Screen quality | 74/100 | 56/100 | ||
Performance | 68/100 | 25/100 | ||
Storage size | 78/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 84/100 | 72/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 80/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 80/100 | 50/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" or "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"
The design of ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" is 147.5mm long, 71.0mm wide, and 7.8mm thick. It weighs 153.0g.
The design of Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB
The "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" is 143.0mm long, 72.0mm wide, and 7.6mm thick. It weighs 126.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 4.5mm in length, 1mm in width, and 0.2mm in thickness. Both the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB". Both the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 27g. The "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 71/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 50/100 | 73/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 64/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"
Display of the ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.
Display of the Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB
The "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB". The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 70/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 70/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"
Camera performance of ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB
The main camera of the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 6MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 80/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 50/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8952 Snapdragon 617 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6735P SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB", the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB". The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" than the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB". The "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 79/100 | 38/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 54/100 | 11/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"
Battery performance of ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2705.0mAh.
Battery performance of Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB
The "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 705mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" over the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB". Both the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 84/100 | 72/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 69/100 | 49/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB
The "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 240GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 59/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" or "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" or "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB". Its perfect screen size of 5.2inch makes the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB", the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 63/100 | 68/100 |
Display | 74/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 68/100 | 25/100 |
General rating | 72/100 | 52/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | |
Color | Ion Gold/Platinum Gray | White/Gray |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 71.0mm x 147.5mm x 7.8mm | 72.0mm x 143.0mm x 7.6mm |
Weight | 153.0g | 126.0g |
Display size | 5.2inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 423ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 2705.0mAh | 2000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8952 Snapdragon 617 | Mediatek MT6735P |
CPU specs | 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |