ZTE Blade S7 32GB vs Micromax Canvas 1 16GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:24:08, Updated date: 2020-04-16 15:19:33
How are the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
ZTE Blade S7 32GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |||
General rating: | 61.3/100 (The 2127th of all smartphones) | 50/100 (The 1513th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 72/100 | 63/100 | ||
Screen quality | 70/100 | 56/100 | ||
Performance | 66/100 | 48/100 | ||
Storage size | 78/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 79/100 | 85/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 100/100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" or "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
The design of ZTE Blade S7 32GB
The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" is 142.0mm long, 67.0mm wide, and 7.2mm thick. It weighs 131.0g.
The design of Micromax Canvas 1 16GB
The "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" is 143.0mm long, 71.0mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 150.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 1mm in length, 4mm in width, and 1.1mm in thickness. "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" is bigger than "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 19g. The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
ZTE Blade S7 32GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 76/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 69/100 | 53/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 68/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
Display of the ZTE Blade S7 32GB
The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the Micromax Canvas 1 16GB
The "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size.
In terms of display, the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB". The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
ZTE Blade S7 32GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
Camera performance of ZTE Blade S7 32GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 13.0MP.
Camera performance of Micromax Canvas 1 16GB
The main camera of the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 8MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
ZTE Blade S7 32GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE Blade S7 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the Micromax Canvas 1 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6737 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB", the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB". The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" than the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB".
ZTE Blade S7 32GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 79/100 | 71/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 53/100 | 32/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
Battery performance of ZTE Blade S7 32GB
The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Battery performance of Micromax Canvas 1 16GB
The "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" slightly more. Both the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade S7 32GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 79/100 | 85/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 60/100 | 71/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade S7 32GB
The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Micromax Canvas 1 16GB
The "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" or "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB". The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade S7 32GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 70/100 | 67/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" or "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" or "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"?
"ZTE Blade S7 32GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB", the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
ZTE Blade S7 32GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 72/100 | 63/100 |
Display | 70/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 66/100 | 48/100 |
General rating | 72/100 | 59/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade S7 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the Micromax Canvas 1 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE Blade S7 32GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |
Color | Black/White/Yellow | Matte Black/Chrome Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 67.0mm x 142.0mm x 7.2mm | 71.0mm x 143.0mm x 8.3mm |
Weight | 131.0g | 150.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 440ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 2500.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 | Mediatek MT6737 |
CPU specs | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |