Compare Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB vs DIGNO T 302KC 8GB
Created date: 2018-02-24 23:33:49, Updated date: 2020-04-04 14:58:08
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB".
Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB | DIGNO T 302KC 8GB | |||
General rating: | 31.2/100 (The 968th of all smartphones) | 45/100 (The 691th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 70/100 | 68/100 | ||
Screen quality | 18/100 | 43/100 | ||
Performance | 15/100 | 36/100 | ||
Storage size | 17/100 | 35/100 | ||
Battery | 65/100 | 71/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 20/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 41/100 | 49/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" or "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"
The design of Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB
The "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" is 113.0mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 12.0mm thick. It weighs 140.0g.
The design of DIGNO T 302KC 8GB
The "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" is 132.0mm long, 65.0mm wide, and 11.2mm thick. It weighs 139.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 19mm in length, 3mm in width, and 0.8mm in thickness. Both the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB". Both the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 1g. There is very little difference in weight between the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.
Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB | DIGNO T 302KC 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 77/100 | 73/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 61/100 | 62/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 68/100 | 66/100 |
Compare the display of the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"
Display of the Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB
The "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" has a 3.5inch screen size.
Display of the DIGNO T 302KC 8GB
The "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 540 x 960, and the pixel density is 244ppi. The "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" has a 4.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" nor the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB | DIGNO T 302KC 8GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 25/100 | 59/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 15/100 | 41/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"
Camera performance of Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB
The main camera of the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" has 2.0MP. The front camera has 0.3MP.
Camera performance of DIGNO T 302KC 8GB
The main camera of the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 1.96MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 6MP difference in comparison. The "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.
There is a 1.66MP difference in front camera pixel number. When taking photos of distant objects, including photos taken using a selfie stick or photos that require clear backgrounds, the camera of "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" has better performance. For taking selfies and profile pictures, "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" is probably better as its camera has a higher resolution for taking photos of near objects.
Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB | DIGNO T 302KC 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 20/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 41/100 | 49/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"
The processing capability of the Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" uses the MediaTek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
The processing capability of the DIGNO T 302KC 8GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.5GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB", the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 510.5MB difference in memory capacity. The "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" has more memory storage, making the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB". The "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" than the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB". Neither the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" nor the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB | DIGNO T 302KC 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 24/100 | 56/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 4/100 | 21/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"
Battery performance of Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB
The "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1420.0mAh.
Battery performance of DIGNO T 302KC 8GB
The "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 580mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" slightly more. The "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
If you're playing games or watching movies for a longer amount of time, or plan on using it for long periods, the battery of the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" may be slightly better.
Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB | DIGNO T 302KC 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 65/100 | 71/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 41/100 | 47/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"
The storage capacity of the Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB
The "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the DIGNO T 302KC 8GB
The "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 4GB. The "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. Neither the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" nor the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 4GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" or "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB".
Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB | DIGNO T 302KC 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 17/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 55/100 | 56/100 |
Which to buy, the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" or "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" or "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB". Its perfect screen size of 4.5inch makes the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" a lot easier to use. The "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" and the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB", the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" is overall the clear winner.
Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB | DIGNO T 302KC 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 70/100 | 68/100 |
Display | 18/100 | 43/100 |
CPU specs | 15/100 | 36/100 |
General rating | 35/100 | 48/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the DIGNO T 302KC 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" and "DIGNO T 302KC 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB | DIGNO T 302KC 8GB | |
Color | / / / / | |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 62.0mm x 113.0mm x 12.0mm | 65.0mm x 132.0mm x 11.2mm |
Weight | 140.0g | 139.0g |
Display size | 3.5inch | 4.5inch |
Display type | TFT | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 320 x 480 | 540 x 960 |
Pixel density | 164ppi | 244ppi |
Battery capacity | 1420.0mAh | 2000.0mAh |
Chipset | MediaTek MT6572M | Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926 |
CPU specs | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 1.5GB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 2.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 0.3MP | 1.96MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |