ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB vs LG AKA (2015) 16GB
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:04:48, Updated date: 2020-04-16 19:21:37
Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and the "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" or "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and the "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"
The design of ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB
The "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" is 155.3mm long, 77.2mm wide, and 8.6mm thick. It weighs 164.0g.
The design of LG AKA (2015) 16GB
The "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" is 138.7mm long, 71.9mm wide, and 10.0mm thick. It weighs 135.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 16.6mm in length, 5.2mm in width, and 1.4mm in thickness. "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" is bigger than "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 29g. The "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB | LG AKA (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 59/100 | 66/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 43/100 | 65/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 57/100 | 61/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"
Display of the ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB
The "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the LG AKA (2015) 16GB
The "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "LG AKA (2015) 16GB". The "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB | LG AKA (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"
Camera performance of ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of LG AKA (2015) 16GB
The main camera of the "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 1.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 4MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB | LG AKA (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 45/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6753,Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the LG AKA (2015) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.5GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "LG AKA (2015) 16GB", the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 0.5GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "LG AKA (2015) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB".
The "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" than the "LG AKA (2015) 16GB". The "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB | LG AKA (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 77/100 | 56/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 41/100 | 21/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"
Battery performance of ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB
The "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Battery performance of LG AKA (2015) 16GB
The "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2610.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 390mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" slightly more. Both the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and the "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB | LG AKA (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 87/100 | 81/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 74/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB
The "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the LG AKA (2015) 16GB
The "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" or "LG AKA (2015) 16GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" or "LG AKA (2015) 16GB".
ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB | LG AKA (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 59/100 | 59/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" or "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" or "LG AKA (2015) 16GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" overall, "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB | LG AKA (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 53/100 | 64/100 |
Display | 74/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 59/100 | 36/100 |
General rating | 64/100 | 55/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the LG AKA (2015) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB" and "LG AKA (2015) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE Blade V Plus 16GB | LG AKA (2015) 16GB | |
Color | Silver | White/Pink/Yellow/Navy |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 77.2mm x 155.3mm x 8.6mm | 71.9mm x 138.7mm x 10.0mm |
Weight | 164.0g | 135.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 400ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 2610.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6753,Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 1.5GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 1.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |