ZTE Axon mini 32GB vs Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:26:23, Updated date: 2021-10-20 17:37:56
How are the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
The design of ZTE Axon mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is 143.5mm long, 70.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 140.0g.
The design of Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB
The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" is 146.2mm long, 73.3mm wide, and 9.7mm thick. It weighs 172.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 2.6mm in length, 3.2mm in width, and 1.7mm in thickness. "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is bigger than "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 32g. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 71/100 | 64/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 61/100 | 38/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 64/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
Display of the ZTE Axon mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.
Display of the Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB
The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB". The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 70/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 70/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
Camera performance of ZTE Axon mini 32GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB
The main camera of the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE Axon mini 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" uses the Exynos 7570 Quad SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB", the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB". The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" than the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB".
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 79/100 | 71/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 54/100 | 33/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
Battery performance of ZTE Axon mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh.
Battery performance of Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB
The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" over the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB". Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 83/100 | 92/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 67/100 | 82/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE Axon mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB
The "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB". Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.2inch makes the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" overall, "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 66/100 | 55/100 |
Display | 74/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 68/100 | 48/100 |
General rating | 72/100 | 62/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Axon mini 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Galaxy Xcover 4 16GB | |
Color | Gold/Chromium Silver/Rose Gold | Gray |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 70.0mm x 143.5mm x 7.9mm | 73.3mm x 146.2mm x 9.7mm |
Weight | 140.0g | 172.0g |
Display size | 5.2inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 423ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 2800.0mAh | 2800.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616 | Exynos 7570 Quad |
CPU specs | 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |