ZTE Axon mini 32GB and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB review
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:27:45, Updated date: 2021-10-20 16:39:18
Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
The design of ZTE Axon mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is 143.5mm long, 70.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 140.0g.
The design of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 161.7mm long, 80.9mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 210.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" for portability.
The difference in weight is 70g. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 71/100 | 52/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 61/100 | 12/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 64/100 | 54/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
Display of the ZTE Axon mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.
Display of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 367ppi. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The display of "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" looks sleeker than that of "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 70/100 | 76/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 70/100 | 78/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
Camera performance of ZTE Axon mini 32GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The main camera of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 80/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE Axon mini 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
"Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" than the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB". The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 79/100 | 85/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 54/100 | 79/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
Battery performance of ZTE Axon mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh.
Battery performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" over the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB". Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 83/100 | 100/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 67/100 | 100/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE Axon mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is a great choice. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 66/100 | 42/100 |
Display | 74/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 68/100 | 82/100 |
General rating | 72/100 | 75/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Axon mini 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
Color | Gold/Chromium Silver/Rose Gold | White/Black/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 70.0mm x 143.5mm x 7.9mm | 80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | 140.0g | 210.0g |
Display size | 5.2inch | 6.0inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 423ppi | 367ppi |
Battery capacity | 2800.0mAh | 5000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616 | Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 |
CPU specs | 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |