Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB vs Pantech EIS01PT (2011): Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:45:39, Updated date: 2020-04-16 14:00:24

ZTE Boost Max+ 16GBPantech EIS01PT (2011)
ZTE Boost Max+ 16GBPantech EIS01PT (2011)

Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)".

ZTE Boost Max+ 16GBPantech EIS01PT (2011)
ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB

Pantech EIS01PT (2011)
General rating:
Griprating-image2.0
82.6mm x 165.1mm x 10.2mm
rating-image3.7
62.0mm x 121.0mm x 11.9mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.1
IPS LCD, 5.7inch, 720 x 1280
rating-image1.5
TFT, 3.7inch, 480 x 800
Performancerating-image2.4
1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores), 2.0GB
rating-image1
Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8655, 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores), 512.0MB
Storage sizerating-image3.5
16.0GB
rating-image1
1.0GB
Batteryrating-image4.4
3400.0mAh
rating-image2.2
1320.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image2.5
8.0MP
rating-image1.8
5.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image2.3
1.0MP
rating-image2.0
0.0MP

What is the difference between the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and the "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)"

The design of ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB

The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" is 165.1mm long, 82.6mm wide, and 10.2mm thick. It weighs 194.8g.

The design of Pantech EIS01PT (2011)

The "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" is 121.0mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 11.9mm thick. It weighs 123.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 44mm in length, 20.5mm in width, and 1.7mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" for portability.

The difference in weight is 71.8g. The "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB

Pantech EIS01PT (2011)

Ease of holding it in one hand44/10077/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand22/10075/100
Ease of carrying around49/10068/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)"

Display of the ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB

The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 257ppi. The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.

Display of the Pantech EIS01PT (2011)

The "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 252ppi. The "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" has a 3.7inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" nor the "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB

Pantech EIS01PT (2011)

How suited is the screen for usual usage?73/10033/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?75/10019/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)"

Camera performance of ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 1.0MP.

Camera performance of Pantech EIS01PT (2011)

The main camera of the "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 0.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.

There is a 1MP difference in front camera pixel number. When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB

Pantech EIS01PT (2011)

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10035/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?45/10040/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)"

The processing capability of the ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB

The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the Pantech EIS01PT (2011)

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8655 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)", the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 510GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB". The "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" than the "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)". The "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB

Pantech EIS01PT (2011)

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet70/10017/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games31/1003/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)"

Battery performance of ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB

The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3400.0mAh.

Battery performance of Pantech EIS01PT (2011)

The "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" has a battery capacity of 1320.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2080mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" over the "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)". The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB

Pantech EIS01PT (2011)

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet88/10044/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos76/10022/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)"

The storage capacity of the ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB

The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory.

The storage capacity of the Pantech EIS01PT (2011)

The "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" has 1.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 15GB. The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB

Pantech EIS01PT (2011)

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/1004/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 54/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" or "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" or "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.7inch makes the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and the "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)", the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" is overall the clear winner.

ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB

Pantech EIS01PT (2011)

Handling40/10074/100
Display61/10029/100
CPU specs47/10013/100
General rating55/10035/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the Pantech EIS01PT (2011), compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "Pantech EIS01PT (2011)". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE Boost Max+ 16GBPantech EIS01PT (2011)
ZTE Boost Max+ 16GBPantech EIS01PT (2011)
ColorGoldBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)82.6mm x 165.1mm x 10.2mm62.0mm x 121.0mm x 11.9mm
Weight194.8g123.0g
Display size5.7inch3.7inch
Display typeIPS LCDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280480 x 800
Pixel density257ppi252ppi
Battery capacity3400.0mAh1320.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon MSM8655
CPU specs1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB512.0MB
Storage size16.0GB1.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP5.0MP
Front-camera resolution1.0MP0.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Check price

New articles