A comparive review of the differences between the Micromax Canvas 1 16GB and ZTE Grand S II 16GB. We covered a wide range of variables
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:39:12, Updated date: 2020-04-16 22:17:14
Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB".
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |||
General rating: | 51.3/100 (The 2369th of all smartphones) | 50/100 (The 1513th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 63/100 | 63/100 | ||
Screen quality | 74/100 | 56/100 | ||
Performance | 55/100 | 48/100 | ||
Storage size | 70/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 72/100 | 85/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 65/100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" or "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
The design of ZTE Grand S II 16GB
The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is 157.0mm long, 77.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 120.0g.
The design of Micromax Canvas 1 16GB
The "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" is 143.0mm long, 71.0mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 150.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 14mm in length, 6mm in width, and 0.4mm in thickness. "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" is bigger than "ZTE Grand S II 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" is more compact than "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 30g. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 60/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 78/100 | 53/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 58/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
Display of the ZTE Grand S II 16GB
The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the Micromax Canvas 1 16GB
The "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB". The "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
Camera performance of ZTE Grand S II 16GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of Micromax Canvas 1 16GB
The main camera of the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE Grand S II 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8674 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the Micromax Canvas 1 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6737 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB", the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" are not large at all. Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB".
The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" as it has better performance.
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 75/100 | 71/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 38/100 | 32/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
Battery performance of ZTE Grand S II 16GB
The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Battery performance of Micromax Canvas 1 16GB
The "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" over the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB". Both the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 72/100 | 85/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 48/100 | 71/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE Grand S II 16GB
The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Micromax Canvas 1 16GB
The "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" or "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 32GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" is recommended over "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos.
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 59/100 | 67/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" or "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" or "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB". Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" a lot easier to use. "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 63/100 | 63/100 |
Display | 74/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 55/100 | 48/100 |
General rating | 63/100 | 59/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Grand S II 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Micromax Canvas 1 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Micromax Canvas 1 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Micromax Canvas 1 16GB | |
Color | Silver | Matte Black/Chrome Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 77.0mm x 157.0mm x 7.9mm | 71.0mm x 143.0mm x 8.3mm |
Weight | 120.0g | 150.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 400ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 2500.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8674 | Mediatek MT6737 |
CPU specs | 2.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |