ZTE Grand S II 16GB vs Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:38:24, Updated date: 2020-04-16 22:16:26
How are the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB | |||
General rating: | 51.3/100 (The 2369th of all smartphones) | 24.6/100 (The 1999th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 63/100 | 74/100 | ||
Screen quality | 74/100 | 18/100 | ||
Performance | 55/100 | 14/100 | ||
Storage size | 70/100 | 2/100 | ||
Battery | 72/100 | 70/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 20/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 65/100 | - /100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" or "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB"
The design of ZTE Grand S II 16GB
The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is 157.0mm long, 77.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 120.0g.
The design of Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB
The "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" is 118.6mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 11.0mm thick. It weighs 125.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 38.4mm in length, 15mm in width, and 3mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" for portability.
The difference in weight is 5g. There is very little difference in weight between the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 60/100 | 78/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 78/100 | 74/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 58/100 | 69/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB"
Display of the ZTE Grand S II 16GB
The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB
The "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" has a 3.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
In terms of display, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB". The "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 25/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 15/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB"
Camera performance of ZTE Grand S II 16GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB
The main camera of the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 11MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 20/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | - |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB"
The processing capability of the ZTE Grand S II 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8674 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" uses the Mediatek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB", the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 254GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB". The "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" than the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB". The "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 75/100 | 24/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 38/100 | 4/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB"
Battery performance of ZTE Grand S II 16GB
The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Battery performance of Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB
The "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1400.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1100mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB". Both the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices.
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 72/100 | 70/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 48/100 | 44/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE Grand S II 16GB
The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB
The "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 496GB. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is recommended over "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos.
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 2/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 59/100 | 54/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" or "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" or "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB", the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is overall the clear winner.
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 63/100 | 74/100 |
Display | 74/100 | 18/100 |
CPU specs | 55/100 | 14/100 |
General rating | 63/100 | 35/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Grand S II 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE Grand S II 16GB | Maxwest Astro 3.5 512MB | |
Color | Silver | White/Black/Pink/Blue/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 77.0mm x 157.0mm x 7.9mm | 62.0mm x 118.6mm x 11.0mm |
Weight | 120.0g | 125.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 3.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 320 x 480 |
Pixel density | 400ppi | 164ppi |
Battery capacity | 2500.0mAh | 1400.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8674 | Mediatek MT6572M |
CPU specs | 2.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 256.0MB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 512.0MB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 2.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |