ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB vs STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:14:23, Updated date: 2020-04-16 16:40:12
Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB".
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB | |||
General rating: | 32.5/100 (The 2936th of all smartphones) | 33.4/100 (The 939th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 72/100 | 68/100 | ||
Screen quality | 34/100 | 30/100 | ||
Performance | 16/100 | 14/100 | ||
Storage size | 17/100 | 17/100 | ||
Battery | 55/100 | 49/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 77/100 | 35/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | - /100 | 40/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and the "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" or "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and the "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"
The design of ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" is 126.0mm long, 64.7mm wide, and 10.8mm thick. It weighs 125.0g.
The design of STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB
The "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" is 125.0mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 12.0mm thick. It weighs 152.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 1mm in length, 2.7mm in width, and 1.1mm in thickness. Both the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB". Both the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 27g. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 74/100 | 77/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 74/100 | 51/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 67/100 | 68/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"
Display of the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has a 4.0inch screen size.
Display of the STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB
The "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 245ppi. The "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" has a 3.8inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Neither the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" nor the "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" nor the "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 46/100 | 37/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 25/100 | 21/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"
Camera performance of ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has 15.0MP.
Camera performance of STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB
The main camera of the "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" has 5.03MP. The front camera has 0.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 9.96MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 77/100 | 35/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | - | 40/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8210 Snapdragon 200 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
The processing capability of the STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" uses the Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×1(1.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
Which has the better processing capability?
The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB". For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and the "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" equally. Neither the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" nor the "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
There is basically no difference between "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Neither the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" nor the "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 27/100 | 20/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 4/100 | 3/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"
Battery performance of ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1400.0mAh.
Battery performance of STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB
The "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1500.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 100mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" is a bit better. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" slightly more.
If you're playing games or watching movies for a longer amount of time, or plan on using it for long periods, the battery of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" may be slightly better. The "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 55/100 | 49/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 33/100 | 27/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB
The "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" or "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Neither the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" nor the "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" or "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB".
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 17/100 | 17/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 55/100 | 55/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" or "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" or "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB". If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB". There isn't much difference between "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 72/100 | 68/100 |
Display | 34/100 | 30/100 |
CPU specs | 16/100 | 14/100 |
General rating | 38/100 | 36/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Is it recommended to buy the STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | STAR7 009Z SoftBank 4GB | |
Color | Orange/Black | / / / / / / |
OS | Firefox | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 64.7mm x 126.0mm x 10.8mm | 62.0mm x 125.0mm x 12.0mm |
Weight | 125.0g | 152.0g |
Display size | 4.0inch | 3.8inch |
Display type | TFT | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 800 | 480 x 800 |
Pixel density | 233ppi | 245ppi |
Battery capacity | 1400.0mAh | 1500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8210 Snapdragon 200 | Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 |
CPU specs | 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.5GHz×1(1.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 512.0MB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 15.0MP | 5.03MP |
Front-camera resolution | 0.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |