ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB vs Coolpad Torino S 16GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:35:51, Updated date: 2021-10-20 15:53:31
Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB".
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | Coolpad Torino S 16GB | |||
General rating: | 32.5/100 (The 2936th of all smartphones) | 48.2/100 (The 634th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 72/100 | 73/100 | ||
Screen quality | 34/100 | 53/100 | ||
Performance | 16/100 | 47/100 | ||
Storage size | 17/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 55/100 | 70/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 77/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | - /100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" or "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"
The design of ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" is 126.0mm long, 64.7mm wide, and 10.8mm thick. It weighs 125.0g.
The design of Coolpad Torino S 16GB
The "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" is 139.0mm long, 67.8mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 120.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 13mm in length, 3mm in width, and 2.9mm in thickness. Both the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB". Both the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 5g. There is very little difference in weight between the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | Coolpad Torino S 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 74/100 | 74/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 74/100 | 78/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 67/100 | 67/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"
Display of the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has a 4.0inch screen size.
Display of the Coolpad Torino S 16GB
The "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 312ppi. The "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" has a 4.7inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. In the gaming end, the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | Coolpad Torino S 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 46/100 | 63/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 25/100 | 48/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"
Camera performance of ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has 15.0MP.
Camera performance of Coolpad Torino S 16GB
The main camera of the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 7MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | Coolpad Torino S 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 77/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | - | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8210 Snapdragon 200 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
The processing capability of the Coolpad Torino S 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB", the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 510MB difference in memory capacity. The "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB". The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
The "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" than the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB". The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | Coolpad Torino S 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 27/100 | 70/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 4/100 | 31/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"
Battery performance of ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1400.0mAh.
Battery performance of Coolpad Torino S 16GB
The "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" has a battery capacity of 1800.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 400mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" over the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB". The "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | Coolpad Torino S 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 55/100 | 70/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 33/100 | 46/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Coolpad Torino S 16GB
The "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 12GB. The "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 12GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" or "Coolpad Torino S 16GB".
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | Coolpad Torino S 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 17/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 55/100 | 59/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" or "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" or "Coolpad Torino S 16GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB". Its perfect screen size of 4.7inch makes the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" and the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB", the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" is overall the clear winner.
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | Coolpad Torino S 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 72/100 | 73/100 |
Display | 34/100 | 53/100 |
CPU specs | 16/100 | 47/100 |
General rating | 38/100 | 57/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Is it recommended to buy the Coolpad Torino S 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" and "Coolpad Torino S 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | Coolpad Torino S 16GB | |
Color | Orange/Black | Black/White/Gold |
OS | Firefox | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 64.7mm x 126.0mm x 10.8mm | 67.8mm x 139.0mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | 125.0g | 120.0g |
Display size | 4.0inch | 4.7inch |
Display type | TFT | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 800 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 233ppi | 312ppi |
Battery capacity | 1400.0mAh | 1800.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8210 Snapdragon 200 | Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 |
CPU specs | 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 15.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |